Glasshouse vs field experiments : do they yield ecologically similar results for assessing N impacts on peat mosses?
© 2012 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2012 New Phytologist Trust.
Veröffentlicht in: | The New phytologist. - 1979. - 195(2012), 2 vom: 04. Juli, Seite 408-418 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Weitere Verfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Online-Aufsatz |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
2012
|
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | The New phytologist |
Schlagworte: | Comparative Study Journal Article Nitrogen N762921K75 |
Zusammenfassung: | © 2012 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2012 New Phytologist Trust. • Peat bogs have accumulated more atmospheric carbon (C) than any other terrestrial ecosystem today. Most of this C is associated with peat moss (Sphagnum) litter. Atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition can decrease Sphagnum production, compromising the C sequestration capacity of peat bogs. The mechanisms underlying the reduced production are uncertain, necessitating multifactorial experiments. • We investigated whether glasshouse experiments are reliable proxies for field experiments for assessing interactions between N deposition and environment as controls on Sphagnum N concentration and production. We performed a meta-analysis over 115 glasshouse experiments and 107 field experiments. • We found that glasshouse and field experiments gave similar qualitative and quantitative estimates of changes in Sphagnum N concentration in response to N application. However, glasshouse-based estimates of changes in production--even qualitative assessments-- diverged from field experiments owing to a stronger N effect on production response in absence of vascular plants in the glasshouse, and a weaker N effect on production response in presence of vascular plants compared to field experiments. • Thus, although we need glasshouse experiments to study how interacting environmental factors affect the response of Sphagnum to increased N deposition, we need field experiments to properly quantify these effects |
---|---|
Beschreibung: | Date Completed 16.10.2012 Date Revised 16.04.2021 published: Print-Electronic CommentIn: New Phytol. 2012 Jul;195(2):279-81. - PMID 22702404 Citation Status MEDLINE |
ISSN: | 1469-8137 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04157.x |