|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000caa a22002652c 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM211328170 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20250213052336.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231224s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01729.x
|2 doi
|
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed25n0704.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM211328170
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)21902720
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Honey-Rosés, Jordi
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
2 |
|a A spatially explicit estimate of avoided forest loss
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2011
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 03.01.2012
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 09.09.2011
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Print
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a ©2011 Society for Conservation Biology.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a With the potential expansion of forest conservation programs spurred by climate-change agreements, there is a need to measure the extent to which such programs achieve their intended results. Conventional methods for evaluating conservation impact tend to be biased because they do not compare like areas or account for spatial relations. We assessed the effect of a conservation initiative that combined designation of protected areas with payments for environmental services to conserve over wintering habitat for the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) in Mexico. To do so, we used a spatial-matching estimator that matches covariates among polygons and their neighbors. We measured avoided forest loss (avoided disturbance and deforestation) by comparing forest cover on protected and unprotected lands that were similar in terms of accessibility, governance, and forest type. Whereas conventional estimates of avoided forest loss suggest that conservation initiatives did not protect forest cover, we found evidence that the conservation measures are preserving forest cover. We found that the conservation measures protected between 200 ha and 710 ha (3-16%) of forest that is high-quality habitat for monarch butterflies, but had a smaller effect on total forest cover, preserving between 0 ha and 200 ha (0-2.5%) of forest with canopy cover >70%. We suggest that future estimates of avoided forest loss be analyzed spatially to account for how forest loss occurs across the landscape. Given the forthcoming demand from donors and carbon financiers for estimates of avoided forest loss, we anticipate our methods and results will contribute to future studies that estimate the outcome of conservation efforts
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Baylis, Kathy
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Ramírez, M Isabel
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
|d 1989
|g 25(2011), 5 vom: 01. Okt., Seite 1032-43
|w (DE-627)NLM098176803
|x 1523-1739
|7 nnas
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:25
|g year:2011
|g number:5
|g day:01
|g month:10
|g pages:1032-43
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01729.x
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 25
|j 2011
|e 5
|b 01
|c 10
|h 1032-43
|