|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000naa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM209154209 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20231224005246.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231224s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01689.x
|2 doi
|
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n0697.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM209154209
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)21672024
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Leidner, Allison K
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Taxonomic and geographic patterns of decline for threatened and endangered species in the United States
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2011
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 15.11.2011
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 20.07.2011
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Print-Electronic
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a © 2011 Society for Conservation Biology.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Species listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (i.e., listed species) have declined to the point that the probability of their extinction is high. The decline of these species, however, may manifest itself in different ways, including reductions in geographic range, number of populations, or overall abundance. Understanding the pattern of decline can help managers assess extinction probability and define recovery objectives. Although quantitative data on changes in geographic range, number of populations, and abundance usually do not exist for listed species, more often qualitative data can be obtained. We used qualitative data in recovery plans for federally listed species to determine whether each listed species declined in range size, number of populations, or abundance relative to historical levels. We calculated the proportion of listed species in each state (or equivalent) that declined in each of those ways. Nearly all listed species declined in abundance, and range size or number of populations declined in approximately 80% of species for which those data were available. Patterns of decline, however, differed taxonomically and geographically. Declines in range were more common among vertebrates than plants, whereas population extirpations were more common among plants. Invertebrates had high incidence of range and population declines. Narrowly distributed plants and invertebrates may be subject to acute threats that may result in population extirpations, whereas vertebrates may be affected by chronic threats that reduce the extent and size of populations. Additionally, in the eastern United States and U.S. coastal areas, where the level of land conversion is high, a greater percentage of species' ranges declined and more populations were extirpated than in other areas. Species in the Southwest, especially plants, had fewer range and population declines than other areas. Such relations may help in the selection of species' recovery criteria
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Neel, Maile C
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
|d 1999
|g 25(2011), 4 vom: 15. Aug., Seite 716-25
|w (DE-627)NLM098176803
|x 1523-1739
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:25
|g year:2011
|g number:4
|g day:15
|g month:08
|g pages:716-25
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01689.x
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 25
|j 2011
|e 4
|b 15
|c 08
|h 716-25
|