Computational models of distributed aberration in ultrasound breast imaging
Two methods for simulation of ultrasound wavefront distortion are introduced and compared with aberration produced in simulations using digitized breast tissue specimens and a conventional multiple time-shift screen model. In the first method, aberrators are generated using a computational model of...
| Veröffentlicht in: | IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control. - 1986. - 57(2010), 12 vom: 15. Dez., Seite 2627-36 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Weitere Verfasser: | , |
| Format: | Online-Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2010
|
| Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control |
| Schlagworte: | Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't |
| Zusammenfassung: | Two methods for simulation of ultrasound wavefront distortion are introduced and compared with aberration produced in simulations using digitized breast tissue specimens and a conventional multiple time-shift screen model. In the first method, aberrators are generated using a computational model of breast anatomy. In the second method, 10 to 12 irregularly shaped, strongly scattering inclusions are superimposed on the multiple-screen model to create a screen-inclusion model. Linear 2-D propagation of a 7.5-MHz planar, pulsed wavefront through each aberrator is computed using a first-order k-space method. The anatomical and screen-inclusion models reproduce two characteristics of arrival-time fluctuations observed in simulations using the digitized specimens that are not represented in simulations using the multiple-screen model: non-Gaussian first-order statistics and sharp changes in the rms arrival-time fluctuation as a function of propagation distance. The anatomical and screen-inclusion models both produce energy- level fluctuations similar to the digitized specimens, but the anatomical model more closely matches the pulse-shape distortion produced by the specimens. Both aberration models can readily be extended to 3-D, and the screen-inclusion model has the advantage of simplicity of implementation. Both models should enable more rigorous evaluation of adaptive focusing algorithms than is possible using conventional time-shift screen models |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Date Completed 29.03.2011 Date Revised 15.12.2010 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
| ISSN: | 1525-8955 |
| DOI: | 10.1109/TUFFC.2010.1737 |