Use of an action-selection framework for human-carnivore conflict in the Bangladesh Sundarbans

© 2010 Society for Conservation Biology.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 24(2010), 5 vom: 01. Okt., Seite 1338-47
1. Verfasser: Barlow, Adam C D (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Greenwood, Christina J, Ahmad, Ishtiaq U, Smith, James L D
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2010
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM196908078
003 DE-627
005 20231223205457.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231223s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01496.x  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0656.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM196908078 
035 |a (NLM)20345402 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Barlow, Adam C D  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Use of an action-selection framework for human-carnivore conflict in the Bangladesh Sundarbans 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 14.04.2011 
500 |a Date Revised 10.12.2019 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a © 2010 Society for Conservation Biology. 
520 |a Human-carnivore conflict is manifested in the death of humans, livestock, and carnivores. The resulting negative local attitudes and retribution killings imperil the future of many endangered carnivores. We tailored existing management tools to create a framework to facilitate the selection of actions to alleviate human-carnivore conflict and applied the framework to the human-tiger conflict in the Bangladesh Sundarbans. We identified potential actions that consider previous management efforts, local knowledge, cost-effectiveness, fieldwork experience of authors and project staff, previous research on tiger ecology by the authors, and recommendations from human-carnivore conflict studies in other countries. Our framework includes creation of a profile to improve understanding of the nature of the conflict and its underlying causality. Identified actions include deterrents, education, direct tiger management, and response teams. We ranked actions by their potential to reduce conflict and the monetary cost of their implementation. We ranked tiger-response teams and monitoring problem tigers as the two best actions because both had relatively high impact and cost-effectiveness. We believe this framework could be used under a wide range of human-wildlife conflict situations because it provides a structured approach to selection of mitigating actions 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 
700 1 |a Greenwood, Christina J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Ahmad, Ishtiaq U  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Smith, James L D  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 24(2010), 5 vom: 01. Okt., Seite 1338-47  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2010  |g number:5  |g day:01  |g month:10  |g pages:1338-47 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01496.x  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 24  |j 2010  |e 5  |b 01  |c 10  |h 1338-47