Ecological-niche modeling and prioritization of conservation-area networks for Mexican herpetofauna

One of the most important tools in conservation biology is information on the geographic distribution of species and the variables determining those patterns. We used maximum-entropy niche modeling to run distribution models for 222 amphibian and 371 reptile species (49% endemics and 27% threatened)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 24(2010), 4 vom: 01. Aug., Seite 1031-41
1. Verfasser: Urbina-Cardona, J Nicolás (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Flores-Villela, Oscar
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2010
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM196908043
003 DE-627
005 20250211101435.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231223s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01432.x  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n0656.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM196908043 
035 |a (NLM)20345399 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Urbina-Cardona, J Nicolás  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Ecological-niche modeling and prioritization of conservation-area networks for Mexican herpetofauna 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 19.10.2010 
500 |a Date Revised 19.07.2010 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a One of the most important tools in conservation biology is information on the geographic distribution of species and the variables determining those patterns. We used maximum-entropy niche modeling to run distribution models for 222 amphibian and 371 reptile species (49% endemics and 27% threatened) for which we had 34,619 single geographic records. The planning region is in southeastern Mexico, is 20% of the country's area, includes 80% of the country's herpetofauna, and lacks an adequate protected-area system. We used probabilistic data to build distribution models of herpetofauna for use in prioritizing conservation areas for three target groups (all species and threatened and endemic species). The accuracy of species-distribution models was better for endemic and threatened species than it was for all species. Forty-seven percent of the region has been deforested and additional conservation areas with 13.7% to 88.6% more native vegetation (76% to 96% of the areas are outside the current protected-area system) are needed. There was overlap in 26 of the main selected areas in the conservation-area network prioritized to preserve the target groups, and for all three target groups the proportion of vegetation types needed for their conservation was constant: 30% pine and oak forests, 22% tropical evergreen forest, 17% low deciduous forest, and 8% montane cloud forests. The fact that different groups of species require the same proportion of habitat types suggests that the pine and oak forests support the highest proportion of endemic and threatened species and should therefore be given priority over other types of vegetation for inclusion in the protected areas of southeastern Mexico 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. 
700 1 |a Flores-Villela, Oscar  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 24(2010), 4 vom: 01. Aug., Seite 1031-41  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2010  |g number:4  |g day:01  |g month:08  |g pages:1031-41 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01432.x  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 24  |j 2010  |e 4  |b 01  |c 08  |h 1031-41