Understanding the lessons and limitations of conservation and development

The lack of concrete instances in which conservation and development have been successfully merged has strengthened arguments for strict exclusionist conservation policies. Research has focused more on social cooperation and conflict of different management regimes and less on how these factors actu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 24(2010), 2 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 461-9
1. Verfasser: Oldekop, Johan A (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Bebbington, Anthony J, Brockington, Dan, Preziosi, Richard F
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2010
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM19536774X
003 DE-627
005 20231223202632.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231223s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01456.x  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0651.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM19536774X 
035 |a (NLM)20184649 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Oldekop, Johan A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Understanding the lessons and limitations of conservation and development 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 24.08.2010 
500 |a Date Revised 24.05.2010 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a The lack of concrete instances in which conservation and development have been successfully merged has strengthened arguments for strict exclusionist conservation policies. Research has focused more on social cooperation and conflict of different management regimes and less on how these factors actually affect the natural environments they seek to conserve. Consequently, it is still unknown which strategies yield better conservation outcomes? We conducted a meta-analysis of 116 published case studies on common resource management regimes from Africa, south and central America, and southern and Southeast Asia. Using ranked sociodemographic, political, and ecological data, we analyzed the effect of land tenure, population size, social heterogeneity, as well as internally devised resource-management rules and regulations (institutions) on conservation outcome. Although land tenure, population size, and social heterogeneity did not significantly affect conservation outcome, institutions were positively associated with better conservation outcomes. There was also a significant interaction effect between population size and institutions, which implies complex relationships between population size and conservation outcome. Our results suggest that communities managing a common resource can play a significant role in conservation and that institutions lead to management regimes with lower environmental impacts 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Meta-Analysis 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
700 1 |a Bebbington, Anthony J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Brockington, Dan  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Preziosi, Richard F  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 24(2010), 2 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 461-9  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2010  |g number:2  |g day:01  |g month:04  |g pages:461-9 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01456.x  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 24  |j 2010  |e 2  |b 01  |c 04  |h 461-9