Comparative performance of A2/O and a novel membrane-bioreactor-based process for biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal

The comparison between a novel membrane bioreactor (MBR) system and a conventional anaerobic-anoxic-aerobic (A2/O) system was conducted using synthetic wastewater (SWW) and municipal wastewater (MWW). Each system was operated at an overall hydraulic retention time of 8 hours and solids retention tim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation. - 1998. - 82(2010), 1 vom: 16. Jan., Seite 69-76
1. Verfasser: Kim, MinGu (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Nakhla, George
Format: Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2010
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation
Schlagworte:Journal Article Membranes, Artificial Water Pollutants, Chemical Phosphorus 27YLU75U4W Nitrogen N762921K75 Oxygen S88TT14065
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM194708691
003 DE-627
005 20231223201255.0
007 tu
008 231223s2010 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0649.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM194708691 
035 |a (NLM)20112540 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Kim, MinGu  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Comparative performance of A2/O and a novel membrane-bioreactor-based process for biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 23.02.2010 
500 |a Date Revised 23.09.2019 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a The comparison between a novel membrane bioreactor (MBR) system and a conventional anaerobic-anoxic-aerobic (A2/O) system was conducted using synthetic wastewater (SWW) and municipal wastewater (MWW). Each system was operated at an overall hydraulic retention time of 8 hours and solids retention time of 10 days. The MBR exhibited better overall system performance than the A2/O system, in terms of phosphorus removal. Nitrogen removal efficiencies were close in the two systems at 73 to 74% in both runs, while phosphorus removal efficiencies were 96 and 74% (SWW run) and 80 and 75% (MWW run), for the MBR and A2/O, respectively. Effluent soluble chemical oxygen demand (COD) was less than 15 mg/L in the two systems during both runs. Phosphorus uptake by denitrifying phosphate-accumulating organisms accounted for 49% of the total uptake in the MBR compared with 33% in the A2/O during the SWW run. The dynamic test clearly showed that the MBR had better denitrification capacity than the A2/O system. The MWW run indicated that MBR ferments particulate COD better than A2/ O. The effect of the intermediate clarifier on MBR phosphorus removal was significant, with phosphorus uptake of 0.16 g/d in the SWW run and phosphorus release of 0.08 g/d in the MWW run, thus enhancing thetotal phosphorus removal in both cases 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 7 |a Membranes, Artificial  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Water Pollutants, Chemical  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Phosphorus  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a 27YLU75U4W  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Nitrogen  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a N762921K75  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Oxygen  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a S88TT14065  |2 NLM 
700 1 |a Nakhla, George  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation  |d 1998  |g 82(2010), 1 vom: 16. Jan., Seite 69-76  |w (DE-627)NLM098214292  |x 1554-7531  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:82  |g year:2010  |g number:1  |g day:16  |g month:01  |g pages:69-76 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 82  |j 2010  |e 1  |b 16  |c 01  |h 69-76