Is surface roughness a "scapegoat" or a primary factor when defining particle-substrate interactions?

Extended DLVO interaction potentials were determined for spherical particles approaching nanopatterned substrates using the numerical surface element integration (SEI) technique. In most cases, nanopatterned ("rough") surfaces produced smaller interaction potentials than chemically identic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids. - 1992. - 26(2010), 4 vom: 16. Feb., Seite 2528-37
1. Verfasser: Huang, Xiaofei (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Bhattacharjee, Subir, Hoek, Eric M V
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2010
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Colloids
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM192788736
003 DE-627
005 20231223193624.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231223s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1021/la9028113  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0643.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM192788736 
035 |a (NLM)19908846 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Huang, Xiaofei  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Is surface roughness a "scapegoat" or a primary factor when defining particle-substrate interactions? 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 26.04.2010 
500 |a Date Revised 09.02.2010 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a Extended DLVO interaction potentials were determined for spherical particles approaching nanopatterned substrates using the numerical surface element integration (SEI) technique. In most cases, nanopatterned ("rough") surfaces produced smaller interaction potentials than chemically identical planar ("smooth") surfaces. For unfavorable scenarios, electrostatic double layer and acid-base potentials were reduced to a greater extent than van der Waals potentials, which made rough surfaces "more attractive" than smooth ones. Two influential surface morphological descriptors emerged: (1) the ratio of particle size to asperity size, a/r, and (2) the ratio of asperity separation to asperity size, p/r. As a/r increased, particle-substrate interaction energy decreased, while the opposite was true for p/r. The simple morphological descriptors gave rise to an analytical model based on the Derjaguin integration (DI) method that compared reasonably well with numerical SEI results, where the size and density of nanopatterned surface features dictated the magnitude of interaction potentials. In fact, changes in the size of nanopatterned surface features impacted the magnitudes of interaction potentials to the same extent as similar changes in the magnitudes of acid-base free energy and zeta potential, which begs the question, "is surface morphology a 'scapegoat' or a primary consideration when defining particle-substrate interactions?" 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 7 |a Colloids  |2 NLM 
700 1 |a Bhattacharjee, Subir  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Hoek, Eric M V  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids  |d 1992  |g 26(2010), 4 vom: 16. Feb., Seite 2528-37  |w (DE-627)NLM098181009  |x 1520-5827  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:26  |g year:2010  |g number:4  |g day:16  |g month:02  |g pages:2528-37 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/la9028113  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
912 |a GBV_ILN_721 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 26  |j 2010  |e 4  |b 16  |c 02  |h 2528-37