Demographic responses of Daphnia magna fed transgenic Bt-maize

The food/feed quality of a variety of genetically modified (GM) maize expressing Cry1Ab Bt-toxin was tested over the life-cycle of Daphnia magna, an arthropod commonly used as model organism in ecotoxicological studies. Demographic responses were compared between animals fed GM or unmodified (UM) ne...

Description complète

Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Ecotoxicology (London, England). - 1992. - 19(2010), 2 vom: 21. Feb., Seite 419-30
Auteur principal: Bøhn, Thomas (Auteur)
Autres auteurs: Traavik, Terje, Primicerio, Raul
Format: Article en ligne
Langue:English
Publié: 2010
Accès à la collection:Ecotoxicology (London, England)
Sujets:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins Bacterial Proteins Endotoxins Hemolysin Proteins Insecticides insecticidal crystal protein, Bacillus Thuringiensis
Description
Résumé:The food/feed quality of a variety of genetically modified (GM) maize expressing Cry1Ab Bt-toxin was tested over the life-cycle of Daphnia magna, an arthropod commonly used as model organism in ecotoxicological studies. Demographic responses were compared between animals fed GM or unmodified (UM) near isogenic maize, with and without the addition of predator smell. Age-specific data on survival and birth rates were integrated and analysed using life tables and Leslie matrices. Survival, fecundity and population growth rate (PGR) data generally disfavoured transgenic Bt-maize as feed for D. magna compared to animals fed the unmodified (UM) near isogenic line of maize. Decomposition of age-specific effects revealed that the most important contributions to a reduced PGR in the GM-fed group came from both fecundity and survival differences early in life. We conclude that juvenile and young adult stages are the most sensitive experimental units and should be prioritized in future research. These stages are often omitted in toxicological/ecotoxicological studies and in feeding trials
Description:Date Completed 30.08.2010
Date Revised 20.10.2021
published: Print-Electronic
Citation Status MEDLINE
ISSN:1573-3017
DOI:10.1007/s10646-009-0427-x