|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01000naa a22002652 4500 |
001 |
NLM191455601 |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20231223191249.0 |
007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
008 |
231223s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01224.x
|2 doi
|
028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n0638.xml
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM191455601
|
035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)19765039
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Parry, Luke
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Hunting for sustainability in tropical secondary forests
|
264 |
|
1 |
|c 2009
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 30.11.2009
|
500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 21.09.2009
|
500 |
|
|
|a published: Print
|
500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status MEDLINE
|
520 |
|
|
|a The interaction between land-use change and the sustainability of hunting is poorly understood but is critical for sustaining hunted vertebrate populations and a protein supply for the rural poor. We investigated sustainability of hunting in an Amazonian landscape mosaic, where a small human population had access to large areas of both primary and secondary forest. Harvestable production of mammals and birds was calculated from density estimates. We compared production with offtake from three villages and used catch-per-unit-effort as an independent measure of prey abundance. Most species were hunted unsustainably in primary forest, leading to local depletion of the largest primates and birds. The estimated sustainable supply of wild meat was higher for primary (39 kg x km(-2) x yr(-1)) than secondary forest (22 kg x km(-2) x yr(-1)) because four species were absent and three species at low abundance in secondary forests. Production of three disturbance-tolerant mammal species was 3 times higher in secondary than in primary forest, but hunting led to overexploitation of one species. Our data suggest that an average Amazonian smallholder would require > or = 3.1 km2 of secondary regrowth to ensure a sustainable harvest of forest vertebrates. We conclude that secondary forests can sustainably provide only 2% of the required protein intake of Amazonian smallholders and are unlikely to be sufficient for sustainable hunting in other tropical forest regions
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Barlow, Jos
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Peres, Carlos A
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
|d 1999
|g 23(2009), 5 vom: 15. Okt., Seite 1270-80
|w (DE-627)NLM098176803
|x 1523-1739
|7 nnns
|
773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:23
|g year:2009
|g number:5
|g day:15
|g month:10
|g pages:1270-80
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01224.x
|3 Volltext
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
952 |
|
|
|d 23
|j 2009
|e 5
|b 15
|c 10
|h 1270-80
|