Sublethal toxicant effects with dynamic energy budget theory : application to mussel outplants
We investigate the effectiveness of a sublethal toxic effect model embedded in Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) theory for the analysis of field data. We analyze the performance of two species of mussels, Mytilus galloprovincialis and M. californianus, near a diffuser discharging produced water in the So...
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecotoxicology (London, England). - 1992. - 19(2010), 1 vom: 23. Jan., Seite 38-47 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Weitere Verfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Online-Aufsatz |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
2010
|
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | Ecotoxicology (London, England) |
Schlagworte: | Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Water Pollutants, Chemical |
Zusammenfassung: | We investigate the effectiveness of a sublethal toxic effect model embedded in Dynamic Energy Budget (DEB) theory for the analysis of field data. We analyze the performance of two species of mussels, Mytilus galloprovincialis and M. californianus, near a diffuser discharging produced water in the Southern California Bight, California. Produced water is a byproduct of oil production consisting of fossil water together with compounds added during the extraction process, and generally contains highly elevated levels of pollutants relative to sea water. Produced water negatively affects the production of somatic and reproductive biomass in both mussel species; we show that these negative effects can be quantified with our DEB-based modeling framework through the estimation of toxic effect scaling parameters. Our analyses reveal that the toxic impact of produced water on growth and reproduction of M. californianus is substantially higher than for M. galloprovincialis. Projections of the expected lifetime production of gonad biomass indicate that the environmental impact of produced water can be as large as 100%, whereas short-term assessment without the use of DEB theory projects a maximum effect of only 30% |
---|---|
Beschreibung: | Date Completed 22.03.2010 Date Revised 20.10.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
ISSN: | 1573-3017 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10646-009-0384-4 |