Comparative molecular simulation study of CO2/N2 and CH4/N2 separation in zeolites and metal-organic frameworks

In this work, a systematic molecular simulation study was performed to compare the separation of CO2/N2 and CH4/N2 mixtures in two different classes of nanoporous materials, zeolites, and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). For this purpose, three zeolites (MFI, LTA, and DDR) and seven MOFs (Cu-BTC, MI...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids. - 1992. - 25(2009), 10 vom: 19. Mai, Seite 5918-26
1. Verfasser: Liu, Bei (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Smit, Berend
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2009
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids
Schlagworte:Journal Article
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In this work, a systematic molecular simulation study was performed to compare the separation of CO2/N2 and CH4/N2 mixtures in two different classes of nanoporous materials, zeolites, and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). For this purpose, three zeolites (MFI, LTA, and DDR) and seven MOFs (Cu-BTC, MIL-47 (V), IRMOF-1, IRMOF-12, IRMOF-14, IRMOF-11, and IRMOF-13) were chosen as the representatives to compare. On the basis of the validated force fields, both adsorption selectivity and pure CO2 and CH4 adsorption isotherms were simulated. The results show that although MOFs perform much better for gas storage, their separation performance is comparable to zeolites; for the systems with the preferable component having a larger quadrupolar moment, both zeolites and MOFs can enhance the separation selectivity, and in contrast they both reduce the selectivity. In addition, we show that ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST) gives a very reasonable prediction of the mixture adsorption isotherms both in zeolites and in MOFs if the pure component isotherms are known. We demonstrate that the difference in quadrupolar moment of the components is an important property that has to be considered in the selection of a membrane material
Beschreibung:Date Completed 23.07.2009
Date Revised 22.02.2010
published: Print
CommentIn: Langmuir. 2010 Feb 16;26(4):2975-8. - PMID 20000597
Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
ISSN:1520-5827
DOI:10.1021/la900823d