Spring or Fall Fumigation for Control of Meloidogyne spp. on Tobacco
Tests were conducted in 1987-88 to compare the efficacy of spring or fall fumigant nematicide applications for control ofMeloidogyne arenaria and M. incognita on tobacco. Chloropicrin, 1,3-D, methyl isothiocyanate, and a methyl isothiocyanate-l,3-D mixture were applied as row treatments. Fenamiphos,...
| Publié dans: | Journal of nematology. - 1969. - 22(1990), 4S vom: 16. Okt., Seite 645-50 |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Autres auteurs: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Langue: | English |
| Publié: |
1990
|
| Accès à la collection: | Journal of nematology |
| Sujets: | Journal Article Meloidogyne arenaria Meloidogyne incognita Nicotiana tabacum chemical control fumigation management nematicide root-knot nematode tobacco |
| Résumé: | Tests were conducted in 1987-88 to compare the efficacy of spring or fall fumigant nematicide applications for control ofMeloidogyne arenaria and M. incognita on tobacco. Chloropicrin, 1,3-D, methyl isothiocyanate, and a methyl isothiocyanate-l,3-D mixture were applied as row treatments. Fenamiphos, fenamiphos + fensulfothion, or ethoprop were applied in the spring as nonfumigant nematicide standards. Fumigant nematicides increased yields and reduced galling (P = 0.01) in all four tests. Spring or fall applications of fumigant nematicides were effective in controlling M. arenaria and M. incognita and were superior to the nonfumigant nematicides tested |
|---|---|
| Description: | Date Completed 14.07.2011 Date Revised 20.10.2021 published: Print Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
| ISSN: | 0022-300X |