|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000caa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM187094578 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20250210063024.0 |
| 007 |
tu |
| 008 |
231223s1989 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c |
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed25n0624.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM187094578
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)19287594
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Cabanillas, E
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Growth of Isolates of Paecilomyces lilacinus and Their Efficacy in Biocontrol of Meloidogyne incognita on Tomato
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 1989
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen
|b n
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Band
|b nc
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 14.07.2011
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 20.10.2021
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Print
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a The potential of 13 Paecilomyces lilacinus isolates from various geographic regions as biocontrol agents against Meloidogyne incognita, the effects of temperature on their growth, and the characterization of the impact of soil temperature on their efficacy for controlling this nematode were investigated. Maximum fungal growth, as determined by dry weight of the mycelium, occurred from 24 to 30 C; least growth was at 12 and 36 C. The best control of M. incognita was provided by an isolate from Peru or a mixture of isolates of P. lilacinus. As soil temperatures increased from 16 to 28 C, both root-knot damage caused by M. incognita and percentage of egg masses infected by P. lilacinus increased. The greatest residual P. lilacinus activity on M. incognita was attained with a mixture of fungal isolates. These isolates effected lower root-galling and necrosis, egg development, and enhanced shoot growth compared with plants inoculated with M. incognita alone
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Meloidogyne incognita
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Paecilomyces lilacinus
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a bioassay
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a biocontrol
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a residual effect
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Barker, K R
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Nelson, L A
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Journal of nematology
|d 1969
|g 21(1989), 2 vom: 16. Apr., Seite 164-72
|w (DE-627)NLM098196421
|x 0022-300X
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:21
|g year:1989
|g number:2
|g day:16
|g month:04
|g pages:164-72
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 21
|j 1989
|e 2
|b 16
|c 04
|h 164-72
|