Effects of Incorporation Method of Ethoprop and Addition of Aldicarb on Potato Tuber Infection by Meloidogyne hapla

The efficacy of controlling Meloidogyne hapla on potato with water incorporation of ethoprop was compared to physical incorporation before planting. The standard practice of aldicarb application for insect control was also evaluated for M. hapla suppression with and without ethoprop. Physical incorp...

Description complète

Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Journal of nematology. - 1969. - 23(1991), 4S vom: 15. Okt., Seite 686-92
Auteur principal: Ingham, R E (Auteur)
Autres auteurs: Morris, M, Newcomb, G B
Format: Article
Langue:English
Publié: 1991
Accès à la collection:Journal of nematology
Sujets:Journal Article Meloidogyne hapla Solanum tuberosum aldicarb chemical control ethoprop incorporation method nematicide nematode northern root-knot nematode potato
LEADER 01000caa a22002652c 4500
001 NLM187054339
003 DE-627
005 20250210062431.0
007 tu
008 231223s1991 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n0624.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM187054339 
035 |a (NLM)19283186 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Ingham, R E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Effects of Incorporation Method of Ethoprop and Addition of Aldicarb on Potato Tuber Infection by Meloidogyne hapla 
264 1 |c 1991 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 14.07.2011 
500 |a Date Revised 20.10.2021 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE 
520 |a The efficacy of controlling Meloidogyne hapla on potato with water incorporation of ethoprop was compared to physical incorporation before planting. The standard practice of aldicarb application for insect control was also evaluated for M. hapla suppression with and without ethoprop. Physical incorporation before planting by rototilling or discing reduced (P </= 0.05) tuber infection. Postplant water incorporation of ethoprop was not as effective as physical incorporation of ethoprop or postplant water incorporation of aldicarb and did not reduce (P </= 0.05) tuber infection at harvest. Ethoprop did not affect yield, whereas aldicarb increased yield in one experiment 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Meloidogyne hapla 
650 4 |a Solanum tuberosum 
650 4 |a aldicarb 
650 4 |a chemical control 
650 4 |a ethoprop 
650 4 |a incorporation method 
650 4 |a nematicide 
650 4 |a nematode 
650 4 |a northern root-knot nematode 
650 4 |a potato 
700 1 |a Morris, M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Newcomb, G B  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of nematology  |d 1969  |g 23(1991), 4S vom: 15. Okt., Seite 686-92  |w (DE-627)NLM098196421  |x 0022-300X  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:23  |g year:1991  |g number:4S  |g day:15  |g month:10  |g pages:686-92 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 23  |j 1991  |e 4S  |b 15  |c 10  |h 686-92