|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01000naa a22002652 4500 |
001 |
NLM186939825 |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20231223175053.0 |
007 |
tu |
008 |
231223s2000 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c |
028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n0623.xml
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM186939825
|
035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)19270990
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Carta, L K
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Bacterial-Feeding Nematode Growth and Preference for Biocontrol Isolates of the Bacterium Burkholderia cepacia
|
264 |
|
1 |
|c 2000
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen
|b n
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a Band
|b nc
|2 rdacarrier
|
500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 14.07.2011
|
500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 20.10.2021
|
500 |
|
|
|a published: Print
|
500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
|
520 |
|
|
|a The potential of different bacterial-feeding Rhabditida to consume isolates of Burkholderia cepacia with known agricultural biocontrol ability was examined. Caenorhabditis elegans, Diploscapter sp., Oscheius myriophila, Pelodera strongyloides, Pristionchus pacificus, Zeldia punctata, Panagrellus redivivus, and Distolabrellus veechi were tested for growth on and preference for Escherichia coli OP50 or B. cepacia maize soil isolates J82, BcF, M36, Bc2, and PHQM100. Considerable growth and preference variations occurred between nematode taxa on individual bacterial isolates, and between different bacterial isolates on a given nematode. Populations of Diploscapter sp. and P. redivivus were most strongly suppressed. Only Z. punctata and P. pacificus grew well on all isolates, though Z. punctata preferentially accumulated on all isolates and P. pacificus had no preference. Oscheius myriophila preferentially accumulated on growth-supportive Bc2 and M36, and avoided less supportive J82 and PHQM100. Isolates with plant-parasitic nematicidal properties and poor fungicidal properties supported the best growth of three members of the Rhabditidae, C. elegans, O. myriophila, and P. strongyloides. Distolabrellus veechi avoided commercial nematicide M36 more strongly than fungicide J82
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Diploscapter sp.
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Distolabrellus veechi
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Escherichia coli OP50
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Oscheius myriophila
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Panagrellus redivivus
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Pelodera strongyloides
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Pristionchus pacificus
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Rhabditida
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Zeldia punctata
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a accumulation
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a attraction Caenorhabditis elegans
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a ecology
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a nutrition
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a phylogeny
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a repellence
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a toxicity
|
773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Journal of nematology
|d 1969
|g 32(2000), 4 vom: 16. Dez., Seite 362-9
|w (DE-627)NLM098196421
|x 0022-300X
|7 nnns
|
773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:32
|g year:2000
|g number:4
|g day:16
|g month:12
|g pages:362-9
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
952 |
|
|
|d 32
|j 2000
|e 4
|b 16
|c 12
|h 362-9
|