|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000naa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM184788374 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20231223171302.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231223s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01119.x
|2 doi
|
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n0616.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM184788374
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)19040652
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Ramsey, David S L
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Quantifying eradication success
|b the removal of feral pigs from Santa Cruz Island, California
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2009
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ƒaComputermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a ƒa Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 05.06.2009
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 27.03.2009
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Print-Electronic
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a A major challenge facing pest-eradication efforts is determining when eradication has been achieved. When the pest can no longer be detected, managers have to decide whether the pest has actually been eliminated and hence to decide when to terminate the eradication program. For most eradication programs, this decision entails considerable risk and is the largest single issue facing managers of such programs. We addressed this issue for an eradication program of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) from Santa Cruz Island, California. Using a Bayesian approach, we estimated the degree of confidence in the success of the eradication program at the point when monitoring failed to detect any more pigs. Catch-effort modeling of the hunting effort required to dispatch pigs during the eradication program was used to determine the relationship between detection probability and searching effort for different hunting methods. We then used these relationships to estimate the amount of monitoring effort required to declare eradication successful with criteria that either set a threshold for the probability that pigs remained undetected (type I error) or minimized the net expected costs of the eradication program (cost of type I and II errors). For aerial and ground-based monitoring techniques, the amount of search effort required to declare eradication successful on the basis of either criterion was highly dependent on the prior belief in the success of the program unless monitoring intensities exceeded 30 km of searching effort per square kilometer of search area for aerial monitoring and, equivalently, 38 km for ground monitoring. Calculation of these criteria to gauge the success of eradication should form an essential component of any eradication program as it allows for a transparent assessment of the risks inherent in the decision to terminate the program
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Parkes, John
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Morrison, Scott A
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
|d 1999
|g 23(2009), 2 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 449-59
|w (DE-627)NLM098176803
|x 1523-1739
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:23
|g year:2009
|g number:2
|g day:01
|g month:04
|g pages:449-59
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01119.x
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 23
|j 2009
|e 2
|b 01
|c 04
|h 449-59
|