A standard lexicon for biodiversity conservation : unified classifications of threats and actions

An essential foundation of any science is a standard lexicon. Any given conservation project can be described in terms of the biodiversity targets, direct threats, contributing factors at the project site, and the conservation actions that the project team is employing to change the situation. These...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1989. - 22(2008), 4 vom: 15. Aug., Seite 897-911
1. Verfasser: Salafsky, Nick (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Salzer, Daniel, Stattersfield, Alison J, Hilton-Taylor, Craig, Neugarten, Rachel, Butchart, Stuart H M, Collen, Ben, Cox, Neil, Master, Lawrence L, O'Connor, Sheila, Wilkie, David
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2008
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article
LEADER 01000caa a22002652c 4500
001 NLM180121189
003 DE-627
005 20250209131216.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231223s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00937.x  |2 doi 
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n0600.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM180121189 
035 |a (NLM)18544093 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Salafsky, Nick  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A standard lexicon for biodiversity conservation  |b unified classifications of threats and actions 
264 1 |c 2008 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ƒaComputermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a ƒa Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 18.11.2008 
500 |a Date Revised 16.04.2009 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a CommentIn: Conserv Biol. 2009 Apr;23(2):482-7; discussion 488-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01196.x. - PMID 19323683 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a An essential foundation of any science is a standard lexicon. Any given conservation project can be described in terms of the biodiversity targets, direct threats, contributing factors at the project site, and the conservation actions that the project team is employing to change the situation. These common elements can be linked in a causal chain, which represents a theory of change about how the conservation actions are intended to bring about desired project outcomes. If project teams want to describe and share their work and learn from one another, they need a standard and precise lexicon to specifically describe each node along this chain. To date, there have been several independent efforts to develop standard classifications for the direct threats that affect biodiversity and the conservation actions required to counteract these threats. Recognizing that it is far more effective to have only one accepted global scheme, we merged these separate efforts into unified classifications of threats and actions, which we present here. Each classification is a hierarchical listing of terms and associated definitions. The classifications are comprehensive and exclusive at the upper levels of the hierarchy, expandable at the lower levels, and simple, consistent, and scalable at all levels. We tested these classifications by applying them post hoc to 1191 threatened bird species and 737 conservation projects. Almost all threats and actions could be assigned to the new classification systems, save for some cases lacking detailed information. Furthermore, the new classification systems provided an improved way of analyzing and comparing information across projects when compared with earlier systems. We believe that widespread adoption of these classifications will help practitioners more systematically identify threats and appropriate actions, managers to more efficiently set priorities and allocate resources, and most important, facilitate cross-project learning and the development of a systematic science of conservation 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
700 1 |a Salzer, Daniel  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Stattersfield, Alison J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Hilton-Taylor, Craig  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Neugarten, Rachel  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Butchart, Stuart H M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Collen, Ben  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Cox, Neil  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Master, Lawrence L  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a O'Connor, Sheila  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Wilkie, David  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1989  |g 22(2008), 4 vom: 15. Aug., Seite 897-911  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:22  |g year:2008  |g number:4  |g day:15  |g month:08  |g pages:897-911 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00937.x  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 22  |j 2008  |e 4  |b 15  |c 08  |h 897-911