|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000caa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM177717491 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20250209060549.0 |
| 007 |
tu |
| 008 |
231223s1996 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c |
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed25n0592.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM177717491
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)18285144
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Matej, S
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Relevance of statistically significant differences between reconstruction algorithms
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 1996
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen
|b n
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Band
|b nc
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 02.10.2012
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 20.02.2008
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Print
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a When comparing reconstruction algorithms, differences in figures of performance merit that are too small to be of any practical relevance may still be statistically significant. We formalize the notion of "relevance" and propose an evaluation methodology in which statistical significance is retained for relevant improvements, but not for irrelevant ones
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Furuie, S S
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Herman, G T
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society
|d 1992
|g 5(1996), 3 vom: 15., Seite 554-6
|w (DE-627)NLM09821456X
|x 1057-7149
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:5
|g year:1996
|g number:3
|g day:15
|g pages:554-6
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 5
|j 1996
|e 3
|b 15
|h 554-6
|