Efficiency of numerical basis sets for predicting the binding energies of hydrogen bonded complexes : evidence of small basis set superposition error compared to Gaussian basis sets

(c) 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2008.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of computational chemistry. - 1984. - 29(2008), 2 vom: 30. Jan., Seite 225-32
1. Verfasser: Inada, Yasuji (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Orita, Hideo
Format: Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2008
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Journal of computational chemistry
Schlagworte:Journal Article
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM170854949
003 DE-627
005 20231223124424.0
007 tu
008 231223s2008 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0570.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM170854949 
035 |a (NLM)17565500 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Inada, Yasuji  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Efficiency of numerical basis sets for predicting the binding energies of hydrogen bonded complexes  |b evidence of small basis set superposition error compared to Gaussian basis sets 
264 1 |c 2008 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 27.03.2008 
500 |a Date Revised 17.12.2007 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE 
520 |a (c) 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2008. 
520 |a Binding energies of selected hydrogen bonded complexes have been calculated within the framework of density functional theory (DFT) method to discuss the efficiency of numerical basis sets implemented in the DFT code DMol3 in comparison with Gaussian basis sets. The corrections of basis set superposition error (BSSE) are evaluated by means of counterpoise method. Two kinds of different numerical basis sets in size are examined; the size of the one is comparable to Gaussian double zeta plus polarization function basis set (DNP), and that of the other is comparable to triple zeta plus double polarization functions basis set (TNDP). We have confirmed that the magnitudes of BSSE in these numerical basis sets are comparative to or smaller than those in Gaussian basis sets whose sizes are much larger than the corresponding numerical basis sets; the BSSE corrections in DNP are less than those in the Gaussian 6-311+G(3df,2pd) basis set, and those in TNDP are comparable to those in the substantially large scale Gaussian basis set aug-cc-pVTZ. The differences in counterpoise corrected binding energies between calculated using DNP and calculated using aug-cc-pVTZ are less than 9 kJ/mol for all of the complexes studied in the present work. The present results have shown that the cost effectiveness in the numerical basis sets in DMol3 is superior to that in Gaussian basis sets in terms of accuracy per computational cost 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
700 1 |a Orita, Hideo  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of computational chemistry  |d 1984  |g 29(2008), 2 vom: 30. Jan., Seite 225-32  |w (DE-627)NLM098138448  |x 1096-987X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:29  |g year:2008  |g number:2  |g day:30  |g month:01  |g pages:225-32 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 29  |j 2008  |e 2  |b 30  |c 01  |h 225-32