Guidelines for assessing immunocompetency in clinical trials for autoimmune diseases

Clinical trials testing the safety and efficacy of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of autoimmune diseases should also be designed to evaluate immunocompetency. The most clinically relevant outcome for assessing immunocompetency is the infection rate. Therefore, a systematic approach to sc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.). - 1999. - 123(2007), 3 vom: 31. Juni, Seite 235-43
1. Verfasser: Looney, R John (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Diamond, Betty, Holers, V Michael, Levesque, Marc C, Moreland, Larry, Nahm, Moon H, St Clair, E William, Autoimmunity Centers of Excellence Immunocompetency Committee
Format: Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2007
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.)
Schlagworte:Journal Article Practice Guideline Review Immunosuppressive Agents
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM168682729
003 DE-627
005 20231223115644.0
007 tu
008 231223s2007 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0562.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM168682729 
035 |a (NLM)17329169 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Looney, R John  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Guidelines for assessing immunocompetency in clinical trials for autoimmune diseases 
264 1 |c 2007 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 27.08.2007 
500 |a Date Revised 02.06.2020 
500 |a published: Print-Electronic 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a Clinical trials testing the safety and efficacy of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of autoimmune diseases should also be designed to evaluate immunocompetency. The most clinically relevant outcome for assessing immunocompetency is the infection rate. Therefore, a systematic approach to screening, monitoring, and reporting infections, modeled after the recommendations of the American Society of Transplantation, is presented. However, because the baseline infection rate in most autoimmune diseases is low, additional tests for immunocompetency should be considered. Evaluation of vaccine responses, an alternative clinically relevant approach, may be particularly useful. Other adjunctive approaches to evaluation of immunocompetency are discussed including immunization with non-vaccine neoantigens, surveillance of chronic viral infections, in vivo or in vitro assessment of cellular immunity, and analysis of innate immunity. Banking genetic material to allow genotyping should be considered particularly if a central repository for samples from different trials can be established 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Practice Guideline 
650 4 |a Review 
650 7 |a Immunosuppressive Agents  |2 NLM 
700 1 |a Diamond, Betty  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Holers, V Michael  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Levesque, Marc C  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Moreland, Larry  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Nahm, Moon H  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a St Clair, E William  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 0 |a Autoimmunity Centers of Excellence Immunocompetency Committee  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.)  |d 1999  |g 123(2007), 3 vom: 31. Juni, Seite 235-43  |w (DE-627)NLM098196855  |x 1521-7035  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:123  |g year:2007  |g number:3  |g day:31  |g month:06  |g pages:235-43 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 123  |j 2007  |e 3  |b 31  |c 06  |h 235-43