Testing hypotheses for the success of different conservation strategies

Evaluations of the success of different conservation strategies are still in their infancy. We used four different measures of project outcomes--ecological, economic, attitudinal, and behavioral--to test hypotheses derived from the assumptions that underlie contemporary conservation solutions. Our h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 20(2006), 5 vom: 15. Okt., Seite 1528-38
1. Verfasser: Brooks, Jeremy S (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Franzen, Margaret A, Holmes, Christopher M, Grote, Mark N, Mulder, Monique Borgerhoff
Format: Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2006
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM165624825
003 DE-627
005 20231223105113.0
007 tu
008 231223s2006 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0552.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM165624825 
035 |a (NLM)17002770 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Brooks, Jeremy S  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Testing hypotheses for the success of different conservation strategies 
264 1 |c 2006 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 01.12.2006 
500 |a Date Revised 16.11.2017 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a Evaluations of the success of different conservation strategies are still in their infancy. We used four different measures of project outcomes--ecological, economic, attitudinal, and behavioral--to test hypotheses derived from the assumptions that underlie contemporary conservation solutions. Our hypotheses concerned the effects of natural resource utilization, market integration, decentralization, and community homogeneity on project success. We reviewed the conservation and development literature and used a specific protocol to extract and code the information in a sample of papers. Although our results are by no means conclusive and suffer from the paucity of high-quality data and independent monitoring (80% of the original sample of 124 projects provided inadequate information for use in this study), they show that permitted use of natural resources, market access, and greater community involvement in the conservation project are all important factors for a successful outcome. Without better monitoring schemes in place, it is still impossible to provide a systematic evaluation of how different strategies are best suited to different conservation challenges 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
700 1 |a Franzen, Margaret A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Holmes, Christopher M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Grote, Mark N  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Mulder, Monique Borgerhoff  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 20(2006), 5 vom: 15. Okt., Seite 1528-38  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:20  |g year:2006  |g number:5  |g day:15  |g month:10  |g pages:1528-38 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 20  |j 2006  |e 5  |b 15  |c 10  |h 1528-38