Incorporation of recreational fishing effort into design of marine protected areas

Theoretical models of marine protected areas (MPAs) that explore benefits to fisheries or biodiversity conservation often assume a dynamic pool of fishing effort. For instance, effort is homogenously distributed over areas from which subsets of reserves are chosen. I tested this and other model assu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 20(2006), 5 vom: 15. Okt., Seite 1466-76
1. Verfasser: Lynch, Tim P (VerfasserIn)
Format: Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2006
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM165624760
003 DE-627
005 20231223105113.0
007 tu
008 231223s2006 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0552.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM165624760 
035 |a (NLM)17002764 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Lynch, Tim P  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Incorporation of recreational fishing effort into design of marine protected areas 
264 1 |c 2006 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 01.12.2006 
500 |a Date Revised 15.11.2012 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a CommentIn: Conserv Biol. 2008 Apr;22(2):482-5; discussion 486-91. - PMID 18402587 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a Theoretical models of marine protected areas (MPAs) that explore benefits to fisheries or biodiversity conservation often assume a dynamic pool of fishing effort. For instance, effort is homogenously distributed over areas from which subsets of reserves are chosen. I tested this and other model assumptions with a case study of the multiple-use Jervis Bay Marine Park. Prior to zoning of the park I conducted 166 surveys of the park's recreational fisheries, plotting the location of 16,009 anglers. I converted these plots into diagrams of fishing effort and analyzed correlates between fishing and habitat and the effect of two reserve designs-the draft and final zoning plans of the park-on the 15 fisheries observed. Fisheries were strongly correlated with particular habitats and had negatively skewed and often bimodal spatial distribution. The second mode of intensely fished habitat could be 6 SD greater than the fishery's mean allocation of effort by area. In the draft-zoning plan, sanctuary zone (no-take) area and potential subduction of fishing effort were similar. In the final plan, which was altered in response to public comment, the area of sanctuary zone increased, and the impact on fishing effort decreased. In only one case was a fishery's most intensely targeted location closed to fishing. Because of the discriminating manner with which fishers target habitats, if simple percentage targets are used for planning, sanctuary location can be adjusted to avoid existing fishing effort. According to modeled outcomes, the implication of this may be diminished reserve effectiveness. To address this, reserve area should be implicitly linked to subducted fishing effort when promoting or modeling MPAs 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 20(2006), 5 vom: 15. Okt., Seite 1466-76  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:20  |g year:2006  |g number:5  |g day:15  |g month:10  |g pages:1466-76 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 20  |j 2006  |e 5  |b 15  |c 10  |h 1466-76