Resolving critical habitat designation failures : reconciling law, policy, and biology

The US. Endangered Species Act (ESA) requires designation of critical habitat concurrent with species listing. The US. Fish and Wildlife Service often has not designated critical habitat, based on the legal exceptions in the ESA of "not prudent" or "not determinable." This lack o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology. - 1999. - 20(2006), 2 vom: 07. Apr., Seite 399-407
1. Verfasser: Hagen, Amy N (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Hodges, Karen E
Format: Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2006
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology
Schlagworte:Journal Article
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM16472124X
003 DE-627
005 20231223103129.0
007 tu
008 231223s2006 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0549.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM16472124X 
035 |a (NLM)16903101 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Hagen, Amy N  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Resolving critical habitat designation failures  |b reconciling law, policy, and biology 
264 1 |c 2006 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 12.09.2006 
500 |a Date Revised 10.11.2019 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a The US. Endangered Species Act (ESA) requires designation of critical habitat concurrent with species listing. The US. Fish and Wildlife Service often has not designated critical habitat, based on the legal exceptions in the ESA of "not prudent" or "not determinable." This lack of habitat designation has led to numerous lawsuits and court orders to designate critical habitat for listed species. Court-mediated implementation of critical habitat is costly and delays listing for at-risk species. Legal, policy, judicial, and biological issues all contribute to the current inability of the law as enforced to lead to timely and cost-effective critical habitat designation. Although increased appropriations and delaying critical habitat designation until recovery planning have been proposed as solutions, we find that it will be essential to change the critical-habitat guidelines to a decision-analysis framework to make critical habitat scientifically and legally workable as a conservation 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
700 1 |a Hodges, Karen E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology  |d 1999  |g 20(2006), 2 vom: 07. Apr., Seite 399-407  |w (DE-627)NLM098176803  |x 1523-1739  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:20  |g year:2006  |g number:2  |g day:07  |g month:04  |g pages:399-407 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 20  |j 2006  |e 2  |b 07  |c 04  |h 399-407