Are any primroses (Primula) primitively monomorphic?

Primula (c. 430 species) and relatives (Primulaceae) are paradigmatic to our understanding of distyly. However, the common co-occurrence of distyly and monomorphy in closely related groups within the family has made the interpretation of its evolution difficult.Here, we infer a chloroplast DNA (cpDN...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New phytologist. - 1979. - 171(2006), 3 vom: 02., Seite 605-16
1. Verfasser: Mast, Austin R (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Kelso, Sylvia, Conti, Elena
Format: Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2006
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:The New phytologist
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't DNA, Chloroplast
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM164379479
003 DE-627
005 20231223102356.0
007 tu
008 231223s2006 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0548.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM164379479 
035 |a (NLM)16866962 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Mast, Austin R  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Are any primroses (Primula) primitively monomorphic? 
264 1 |c 2006 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 27.09.2006 
500 |a Date Revised 31.03.2022 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a Primula (c. 430 species) and relatives (Primulaceae) are paradigmatic to our understanding of distyly. However, the common co-occurrence of distyly and monomorphy in closely related groups within the family has made the interpretation of its evolution difficult.Here, we infer a chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) phylogeny for 207 accessions, including 51% of the species and 95% of the sections of Primula with monomorphic populations, using Bayesian methods. With this tree, we infer the distribution of ancestral states on critical nodes using parsimony and likelihood methods. The inferred cpDNA phylogeny is consistent with prior estimates. The most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of Primula is resolved as distylous using both methods of inference. However, whether the distyly in Primula, Hottonia, and Vitaliana arose once or three independent times is not clear. We conclude that monomorphism in descendants of the MRCA of Primula is derived from distyly in all cases. Thus, scenarios for the evolution of distyly that rely on the persistence of primitive monomorphy (such as in Primula section Sphondylia) require re-evaluation 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 7 |a DNA, Chloroplast  |2 NLM 
700 1 |a Kelso, Sylvia  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Conti, Elena  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The New phytologist  |d 1979  |g 171(2006), 3 vom: 02., Seite 605-16  |w (DE-627)NLM09818248X  |x 1469-8137  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:171  |g year:2006  |g number:3  |g day:02  |g pages:605-16 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 171  |j 2006  |e 3  |b 02  |h 605-16