|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01000naa a22002652 4500 |
001 |
NLM163273553 |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20231223095958.0 |
007 |
tu |
008 |
231223s2006 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c |
028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed24n0544.xml
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM163273553
|
035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)16749304
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Kim, B R
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Design and startup of a membrane-biological-reactor system at a Ford-engine plant for treating oily wastewater
|
264 |
|
1 |
|c 2006
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen
|b n
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a Band
|b nc
|2 rdacarrier
|
500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 03.10.2006
|
500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 22.09.2019
|
500 |
|
|
|a published: Print
|
500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status MEDLINE
|
520 |
|
|
|a A wastewater-treatment facility at Ford (Dearborn, Michigan) was recently upgraded from chemical de-emulsification to ultrafiltration (UF) followed by a membrane-biological reactor (MBR). This paper describes the design, startup, and initial operational performance of the facility. Primary findings are as follows: (1) the MBR proved resilient; (2) the MBR removed approximately 90% of chemical-oxygen demand (COD) after primary UF; (3) the removal of total Kjeldahl nitrogen by MBR appeared to be more sensitive to operating conditions than COD removal; (4) nitrification and denitrification were established in one month; (5) the MBR removed oil and grease and phenolics to below detection levels consistently, in contrast to widely fluctuating concentrations in the past; (6) permeate fluxes of the primary and MBR UF were adversely affected by inadvertent use of a silicone-based defoamer; and (7) zinc concentrations in the effluent increased, which might have been a result of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid used in membrane washing solutions and/or might have been within typical concentration ranges
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Industrial Waste
|2 NLM
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Membranes, Artificial
|2 NLM
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Nitrates
|2 NLM
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Petroleum
|2 NLM
|
650 |
|
7 |
|a Water Pollutants, Chemical
|2 NLM
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Anderson, J E
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Mueller, S A
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Gaines, W A
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Szafranski, M J
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Bremmer, A L
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Yarema, G J
|c Jr
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Guciardo, C D
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Linden, S
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Doherty, T E
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation
|d 1998
|g 78(2006), 4 vom: 31. Apr., Seite 362-71
|w (DE-627)NLM098214292
|x 1554-7531
|7 nnns
|
773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:78
|g year:2006
|g number:4
|g day:31
|g month:04
|g pages:362-71
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
952 |
|
|
|d 78
|j 2006
|e 4
|b 31
|c 04
|h 362-71
|