Design and startup of a membrane-biological-reactor system at a Ford-engine plant for treating oily wastewater

A wastewater-treatment facility at Ford (Dearborn, Michigan) was recently upgraded from chemical de-emulsification to ultrafiltration (UF) followed by a membrane-biological reactor (MBR). This paper describes the design, startup, and initial operational performance of the facility. Primary findings...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation. - 1998. - 78(2006), 4 vom: 31. Apr., Seite 362-71
1. Verfasser: Kim, B R (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Anderson, J E, Mueller, S A, Gaines, W A, Szafranski, M J, Bremmer, A L, Yarema, G J Jr, Guciardo, C D, Linden, S, Doherty, T E
Format: Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2006
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation
Schlagworte:Journal Article Industrial Waste Membranes, Artificial Nitrates Petroleum Water Pollutants, Chemical
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM163273553
003 DE-627
005 20231223095958.0
007 tu
008 231223s2006 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0544.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM163273553 
035 |a (NLM)16749304 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Kim, B R  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Design and startup of a membrane-biological-reactor system at a Ford-engine plant for treating oily wastewater 
264 1 |c 2006 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 03.10.2006 
500 |a Date Revised 22.09.2019 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a A wastewater-treatment facility at Ford (Dearborn, Michigan) was recently upgraded from chemical de-emulsification to ultrafiltration (UF) followed by a membrane-biological reactor (MBR). This paper describes the design, startup, and initial operational performance of the facility. Primary findings are as follows: (1) the MBR proved resilient; (2) the MBR removed approximately 90% of chemical-oxygen demand (COD) after primary UF; (3) the removal of total Kjeldahl nitrogen by MBR appeared to be more sensitive to operating conditions than COD removal; (4) nitrification and denitrification were established in one month; (5) the MBR removed oil and grease and phenolics to below detection levels consistently, in contrast to widely fluctuating concentrations in the past; (6) permeate fluxes of the primary and MBR UF were adversely affected by inadvertent use of a silicone-based defoamer; and (7) zinc concentrations in the effluent increased, which might have been a result of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid used in membrane washing solutions and/or might have been within typical concentration ranges 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 7 |a Industrial Waste  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Membranes, Artificial  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Nitrates  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Petroleum  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a Water Pollutants, Chemical  |2 NLM 
700 1 |a Anderson, J E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Mueller, S A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Gaines, W A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Szafranski, M J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Bremmer, A L  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Yarema, G J  |c Jr  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Guciardo, C D  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Linden, S  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Doherty, T E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation  |d 1998  |g 78(2006), 4 vom: 31. Apr., Seite 362-71  |w (DE-627)NLM098214292  |x 1554-7531  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:78  |g year:2006  |g number:4  |g day:31  |g month:04  |g pages:362-71 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 78  |j 2006  |e 4  |b 31  |c 04  |h 362-71