Recovering articulated pose : a comparison of two pre and postimposed constraint methods

We contrast the performance of two methods of imposing constraints during the tracking of articulated objects, the first method preimposing the kinematic constraints during tracking and, thus, using the minimum degrees of freedom, and the second imposing constraints after tracking and, hence, using...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence. - 1979. - 28(2006), 1 vom: 24. Jan., Seite 163-8
1. Verfasser: de Campos, Teofilo E (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Tordoff, Ben J, Murray, David W
Format: Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2006
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence
Schlagworte:Comparative Study Evaluation Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM160011191
003 DE-627
005 20231223085237.0
007 tu
008 231223s2006 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0533.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM160011191 
035 |a (NLM)16402630 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a de Campos, Teofilo E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Recovering articulated pose  |b a comparison of two pre and postimposed constraint methods 
264 1 |c 2006 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 01.02.2006 
500 |a Date Revised 10.12.2019 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a We contrast the performance of two methods of imposing constraints during the tracking of articulated objects, the first method preimposing the kinematic constraints during tracking and, thus, using the minimum degrees of freedom, and the second imposing constraints after tracking and, hence, using the maximum. Despite their very different formulations, the methods recover the same pose change. Further comparisons are drawn in terms of computational speed and algorithmic simplicity and robustness, and it is the last area which is the most telling. The results suggest that using built-in constraints is well-suited to tracking individual articulated objects, whereas applying constraints afterward is most suited to problems involving contact and breakage between articulated (or rigid) objects, where the ability to test tracking performance quickly with constraints turned on or off is desirable 
650 4 |a Comparative Study 
650 4 |a Evaluation Study 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
700 1 |a Tordoff, Ben J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Murray, David W  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence  |d 1979  |g 28(2006), 1 vom: 24. Jan., Seite 163-8  |w (DE-627)NLM098212257  |x 1939-3539  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:28  |g year:2006  |g number:1  |g day:24  |g month:01  |g pages:163-8 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 28  |j 2006  |e 1  |b 24  |c 01  |h 163-8