Dopamine appetite and cognitive impairment in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder

The underlying defects in ADHD (Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder) are not yet clear. The current paper tests three existing theories: State Regulation, Cognitive Deficit, and Temporal Difference (TD) learning. We present computational simulations of the Matching Familiar Figures Task and com...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neural plasticity. - 1998. - 11(2004), 1-2 vom: 06., Seite 115-32
1. Verfasser: Williams, Jonathan (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Taylor, Eric
Format: Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2004
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Neural plasticity
Schlagworte:Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Dopamine VTD58H1Z2X
LEADER 01000caa a22002652c 4500
001 NLM149838980
003 DE-627
005 20250205181237.0
007 tu
008 231223s2004 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n0500.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM149838980 
035 |a (NLM)15303309 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Williams, Jonathan  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Dopamine appetite and cognitive impairment in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder 
264 1 |c 2004 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 07.09.2004 
500 |a Date Revised 16.03.2016 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a The underlying defects in ADHD (Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder) are not yet clear. The current paper tests three existing theories: State Regulation, Cognitive Deficit, and Temporal Difference (TD) learning. We present computational simulations of the Matching Familiar Figures Task and compare these with the experimental results reported by Sonuga-Barke (2002). The TD model contains four parameters: the learning rate, discounting for future rewards, brittleness (randomness) of behavior, and action bias. The results show that the basic TD model accounts well for control performance in trials of 5 sec, 10 sec, and 15 sec duration; but not for the deficits in ADHD performance at 5 sec and 15 sec. Extending the TD model to incorporate either a state regulation deficit, or working memory deficit and delay in starting trials, can provide a good account of both control and ADHD results, at all trial-lengths. We discuss the significance of the results for theories of ADHD and make suggestions for future experimentation 
650 4 |a Comparative Study 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 7 |a Dopamine  |2 NLM 
650 7 |a VTD58H1Z2X  |2 NLM 
700 1 |a Taylor, Eric  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Neural plasticity  |d 1998  |g 11(2004), 1-2 vom: 06., Seite 115-32  |w (DE-627)NLM098558390  |x 1687-5443  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:11  |g year:2004  |g number:1-2  |g day:06  |g pages:115-32 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_21 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 11  |j 2004  |e 1-2  |b 06  |h 115-32