Comparison of natural adsorbents for metal removal from acidic effluent
Adsorption tests were carried out in acidic synthetic solutions (pH 2.0) using 20 g l(-1) of various natural adsorbents and 0.25 mM of 11 different metals. In decreasing order, the most efficient adsorbents tested were: oyster shells, cedar bark, vermiculite, cocoa shells and peanut shells. In contr...
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental technology. - 1998. - 24(2003), 2 vom: 05. Feb., Seite 205-15 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Weitere Verfasser: | , , |
Format: | Aufsatz |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
2003
|
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | Environmental technology |
Schlagworte: | Comparative Study Journal Article Aluminum Silicates Metals vermiculite 1318-00-9 |
Zusammenfassung: | Adsorption tests were carried out in acidic synthetic solutions (pH 2.0) using 20 g l(-1) of various natural adsorbents and 0.25 mM of 11 different metals. In decreasing order, the most efficient adsorbents tested were: oyster shells, cedar bark, vermiculite, cocoa shells and peanut shells. In contrast, weak metal adsorption was demonstrated by: red cedar wood, peat moss, pine wood, corn cobs and perlite. Metal adsorption capacities in acidic synthetic solution followed the order: Pb2+> Cr3+> Cu2+> Fe2+> Al3+> Ni2+> Cd2+ > Mn2+ > Zn2+ >> Ca2+, Mg2+. Alkaline treatment (0.75 M NaOH) increased the effectiveness of metal removal for the majority of adsorbents. In contrast, acid treatment (0.75 M H2SO4) either reduced or did not affect the adsorption capacity of the materials tested. Finally, oyster shells, red cedar wood, vermiculite, cocoa shells and peanut shells, were effective natural adsorbents for the selective recovery of lead and trivalent chromium from acidic effluent |
---|---|
Beschreibung: | Date Completed 10.06.2003 Date Revised 19.11.2015 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
ISSN: | 0959-3330 |