|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000caa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
NLM124297226 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20250203213958.0 |
| 007 |
tu |
| 008 |
231222s2003 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c |
| 028 |
5 |
2 |
|a pubmed25n0415.xml
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)NLM124297226
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (NLM)12656287
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Andersen, Peter F
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
2 |
|a A post audit of a model-designed ground water extraction system
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2003
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen
|b n
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Band
|b nc
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Completed 09.06.2003
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Date Revised 06.11.2019
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a published: Print
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a Citation Status MEDLINE
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Model post audits test the predictive capabilities of ground water models and shed light on their practical limitations. In the work presented here, ground water model predictions were used to design an extraction/treatment/injection system at a military ammunition facility and then were re-evaluated using site-specific water-level data collected approximately one year after system startup. The water-level data indicated that performance specifications for the design, i.e., containment, had been achieved over the required area, but that predicted water-level changes were greater than observed, particularly in the deeper zones of the aquifer. Probable model error was investigated by determining the changes that were required to obtain an improved match to observed water-level changes. This analysis suggests that the originally estimated hydraulic properties were in error by a factor of two to five. These errors may have resulted from attributing less importance to data from deeper zones of the aquifer and from applying pumping test results to a volume of material that was larger than the volume affected by the pumping test. To determine the importance of these errors to the predictions of interest, the models were used to simulate the capture zones resulting from the originally estimated and updated parameter values. The study suggests that, despite the model error, the ground water model contributed positively to the design of the remediation system
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Journal Article
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Soil
|2 NLM
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Lu, Silong
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Ground water
|d 1998
|g 41(2003), 2 vom: März, Seite 212-8
|w (DE-627)NLM098182528
|x 0017-467X
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:41
|g year:2003
|g number:2
|g month:03
|g pages:212-8
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a SYSFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_NLM
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_ILN_350
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 41
|j 2003
|e 2
|c 03
|h 212-8
|