Simulation study supporting wastewater treatment plant upgrading

The paper presents a study where upgrading of an existing wastewater treatment plant was supported by simulation. The aim of the work was to decide between two technologies to improve nitrogen removal: a conventional activated sludge process (ASP) and a moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR). To perform...

Description complète

Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research. - 1986. - 46(2002), 4-5 vom: 25., Seite 325-32
Auteur principal: Hvala, N (Auteur)
Autres auteurs: Vrecko, D, Burica, O, Strazar, M, Levstek, M
Format: Article
Langue:English
Publié: 2002
Accès à la collection:Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research
Sujets:Journal Article Sewage Carbon 7440-44-0 Nitrogen N762921K75
Description
Résumé:The paper presents a study where upgrading of an existing wastewater treatment plant was supported by simulation. The aim of the work was to decide between two technologies to improve nitrogen removal: a conventional activated sludge process (ASP) and a moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR). To perform simulations, the mathematical models of both processes were designed. The models were calibrated based on data from ASP and MBBR pilot plants operating in parallel on the existing plant. Only two kinetic parameters needed to be adjusted to represent the real plant behaviour. Steady-state analyses have shown a similar efficiency of both processes in relation to carbon removal, but improved performance of MBBR in relation to nitrogen removal. Better performance of MBBR can be expected especially at low temperatures. Simulations have not confirmed the expected less volume required for the MBBR process. Finally, the MBBR was chosen for plant upgrading. The developed process model will be further used to evaluate the final plant configuration and to optimise the plant operating parameters
Description:Date Completed 06.02.2003
Date Revised 21.11.2013
published: Print
Citation Status MEDLINE
ISSN:0273-1223