A comparison of a printed patient summary document with its electronic equivalent : early results

Clinicians are always searching for efficient access to clinical data. The Regenstrief Medical Record System has a printed report that fills this niche: Pocket Rounds. Handheld computers may offer an alternative, but it is unclear how effectively a handheld computer can display such data. We surveye...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings. AMIA Symposium. - 1998. - (2001) vom: 11., Seite 701-5
1. Verfasser: Thomas, S M (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Overhage, J M, Warvel, J, McDonald, C J
Format: Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2001
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Proceedings. AMIA Symposium
Schlagworte:Comparative Study Evaluation Study Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 NLM117123854
003 DE-627
005 20250203022415.0
007 tu
008 231222s2001 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
028 5 2 |a pubmed25n0391.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM117123854 
035 |a (NLM)11825276 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Thomas, S M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A comparison of a printed patient summary document with its electronic equivalent  |b early results 
264 1 |c 2001 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 24.05.2002 
500 |a Date Revised 10.12.2019 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a Clinicians are always searching for efficient access to clinical data. The Regenstrief Medical Record System has a printed report that fills this niche: Pocket Rounds. Handheld computers may offer an alternative, but it is unclear how effectively a handheld computer can display such data. We surveyed residents and students on the general medicine services for their opinions regarding Pocket Rounds. Those with handheld computers were given access to an electronic version of Pocket Rounds-e-Rounds. We surveyed the subjects who used e-Rounds for their opinions on the electronic format and how it compared to paper. Users overall satisfaction with Pocket Rounds was 5.8 on a seven-point scale. User s overall satisfaction for e-Rounds was 5.6 on a seven-point scale. The most useful function was retrieval of lab data for both modalities. The results suggest that the electronic format is a viable alternative to paper. Further evaluation is needed, and we plan a prospective controlled trial to study this further 
650 4 |a Comparative Study 
650 4 |a Evaluation Study 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. 
700 1 |a Overhage, J M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Warvel, J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a McDonald, C J  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Proceedings. AMIA Symposium  |d 1998  |g (2001) vom: 11., Seite 701-5  |w (DE-627)NLM098642928  |x 1531-605X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g year:2001  |g day:11  |g pages:701-5 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |j 2001  |b 11  |h 701-5