Using the flexibility index to compare batch and continuous activated sludge processes
This paper considers the question of which is better: the batch or the continuous activated sludge processes? It is an important question because dissension still exists in the wastewater industry as to the relative merits of each of the processes. A review of perceived differences in the processes...
Veröffentlicht in: | Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research. - 1986. - 43(2001), 3 vom: 18., Seite 35-43 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Weitere Verfasser: | , |
Format: | Aufsatz |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
2001
|
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research |
Schlagworte: | Comparative Study Journal Article Review Sewage |
Zusammenfassung: | This paper considers the question of which is better: the batch or the continuous activated sludge processes? It is an important question because dissension still exists in the wastewater industry as to the relative merits of each of the processes. A review of perceived differences in the processes from the point of view of two related disciplines, process engineering and biotechnology, is presented together with the results of previous comparative studies. These reviews highlight possible areas where more understanding is required. This is provided in the paper by application of the flexibility index to two case studies. The flexibility index is a useful process design tool that measures the ability of the process to cope with long term changes in operation |
---|---|
Beschreibung: | Date Completed 28.06.2001 Date Revised 15.11.2006 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
ISSN: | 0273-1223 |