A feasibility study of two methods for end-user configuration of a clinical event monitor

We developed and evaluated a feature that allows users to control what types of clinical information are delivered to them. Using a paper or web-based configuration form, users turn individual alerts and sets of results on or off, and set how they are delivered. We used usage rates to evaluate this...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings. AMIA Symposium. - 1998. - (1999) vom: 23., Seite 975-8
1. Verfasser: Tsui, F C (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Wagner, M M, Wilbright, W, Tse, A, Hogan, W R
Format: Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 1999
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Proceedings. AMIA Symposium
Schlagworte:Comparative Study Journal Article
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM104964987
003 DE-627
005 20231222133640.0
007 tu
008 231222s1999 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0350.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM104964987 
035 |a (NLM)10566506 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Tsui, F C  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A feasibility study of two methods for end-user configuration of a clinical event monitor 
264 1 |c 1999 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 01.02.2000 
500 |a Date Revised 21.10.2016 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a We developed and evaluated a feature that allows users to control what types of clinical information are delivered to them. Using a paper or web-based configuration form, users turn individual alerts and sets of results on or off, and set how they are delivered. We used usage rates to evaluate this feature. Of 16 residents who had received clinical information from our clinical event monitor, 4 (25%) made at least one change (range 10-25). Of 41 interns, 5 (12.2%) made at least one change (range 5-91). The difference was borderline significant (p < 0.1). 5/7 web users changed preferences through a dial-up connection from home. More users used the web-based preference form than the paper form. This difference may be due to the better accessibility of the web-based form. A survey established that this feature was not as highly utilized as anticipated partly because the initial (default) preference setting was acceptable and partly because the users were too busy to customize their alert settings. We conclude that user configuration of a system that delivers information using a web-based preference form is feasible and may become important as the volume of information and number of available communication channels increase 
650 4 |a Comparative Study 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
700 1 |a Wagner, M M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Wilbright, W  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Tse, A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Hogan, W R  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Proceedings. AMIA Symposium  |d 1998  |g (1999) vom: 23., Seite 975-8  |w (DE-627)NLM098642928  |x 1531-605X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g year:1999  |g day:23  |g pages:975-8 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |j 1999  |b 23  |h 975-8