Evaluating variable selection methods for diagnosis of myocardial infarction

This paper evaluates the variable selection performed by several machine-learning techniques on a myocardial infarction data set. The focus of this work is to determine which of 43 input variables are considered relevant for prediction of myocardial infarction. The algorithms investigated were logis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings. AMIA Symposium. - 1998. - (1999) vom: 23., Seite 246-50
1. Verfasser: Dreiseitl, S (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Ohno-Machado, L, Vinterbo, S
Format: Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 1999
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Proceedings. AMIA Symposium
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM104963506
003 DE-627
005 20231222133638.0
007 tu
008 231222s1999 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0350.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM104963506 
035 |a (NLM)10566358 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Dreiseitl, S  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Evaluating variable selection methods for diagnosis of myocardial infarction 
264 1 |c 1999 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 01.02.2000 
500 |a Date Revised 10.12.2019 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a This paper evaluates the variable selection performed by several machine-learning techniques on a myocardial infarction data set. The focus of this work is to determine which of 43 input variables are considered relevant for prediction of myocardial infarction. The algorithms investigated were logistic regression (with stepwise, forward, and backward selection), backpropagation for multilayer perceptrons (input relevance determination), Bayesian neural networks (automatic relevance determination), and rough sets. An independent method (self-organizing maps) was then used to evaluate and visualize the different subsets of predictor variables. Results show good agreement on some predictors, but also variability among different methods; only one variable was selected by all models 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. 
700 1 |a Ohno-Machado, L  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Vinterbo, S  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Proceedings. AMIA Symposium  |d 1998  |g (1999) vom: 23., Seite 246-50  |w (DE-627)NLM098642928  |x 1531-605X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g year:1999  |g day:23  |g pages:246-50 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |j 1999  |b 23  |h 246-50