Trial of labor versus elective repeat cesarean section for the women with a previous cesarean section : a decision analysis

In order to reduce the cesarean-delivery rate, more and more pregnant women are offered trials of labor (TOL) after their previous cesarean sections. TOL and elective repeat cesarean section (ERCS) have different risks and benefits. We constructed a decision analysis to explore this issue. Probabili...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings. AMIA Symposium. - 1998. - (1999) vom: 23., Seite 226-30
1. Verfasser: Chuang, J H (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Jenders, R A
Format: Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 1999
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Proceedings. AMIA Symposium
Schlagworte:Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM104963468
003 DE-627
005 20231222133638.0
007 tu
008 231222s1999 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0350.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM104963468 
035 |a (NLM)10566354 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Chuang, J H  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Trial of labor versus elective repeat cesarean section for the women with a previous cesarean section  |b a decision analysis 
264 1 |c 1999 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 01.02.2000 
500 |a Date Revised 13.11.2018 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a In order to reduce the cesarean-delivery rate, more and more pregnant women are offered trials of labor (TOL) after their previous cesarean sections. TOL and elective repeat cesarean section (ERCS) have different risks and benefits. We constructed a decision analysis to explore this issue. Probabilities were derived from literature reviews. Health state utilities were derived from the authors' clinical judgement. The analysis considered the disutility of the procedures and the disutilities of the morbidity. Using the baseline assumption, ERCS was superior to TOL. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the result was insensitive to all of the probability estimates and the disutilities of the morbidity. However, the result was sensitive to the patient's preference for ERCS, successful TOL, or failed TOL. The analysis indicates that the best delivery method for a woman who has had a previous cesarean section depends on patient's preference. More patients' preference studies are needed 
650 4 |a Comparative Study 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
650 4 |a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. 
700 1 |a Jenders, R A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Proceedings. AMIA Symposium  |d 1998  |g (1999) vom: 23., Seite 226-30  |w (DE-627)NLM098642928  |x 1531-605X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g year:1999  |g day:23  |g pages:226-30 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |j 1999  |b 23  |h 226-30