A clinical terminology in the post modern era : pragmatic problem list development

A brief review of the rich heritage of classifications and terminologies is the background for a description of the Mayo Clinic's clinical terminology development. Vender specific system constraints prompted the scope and style of an interim problem list vocabulary. We describe the sources and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings. AMIA Symposium. - 1998. - (1998) vom: 13., Seite 795-9
1. Verfasser: Chute, C G (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Elkin, P L, Fenton, S H, Atkin, G E
Format: Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 1998
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Proceedings. AMIA Symposium
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM098644475
003 DE-627
005 20231222112458.0
007 tu
008 231222s1998 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0329.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM098644475 
035 |a (NLM)9929328 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Chute, C G  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A clinical terminology in the post modern era  |b pragmatic problem list development 
264 1 |c 1998 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 16.03.1999 
500 |a Date Revised 13.11.2018 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a A brief review of the rich heritage of classifications and terminologies is the background for a description of the Mayo Clinic's clinical terminology development. Vender specific system constraints prompted the scope and style of an interim problem list vocabulary. We describe the sources and review process which led to a working terminology for use in a Computer-based Patient Record (CPR). Because terminology development is often subjective and metrics against which to measure the quality of individual human judgements are few, we decided to compare the selection of preferred terms made by general internists with those made by sub-specialists. A significant difference between a sub-specialist's assignment of preferred terms and a general internist's (948 vs. 2271, P < 0.001) was observed. Sub-specialists were less than half as likely as a generalist to designate a term as a preferred form. These results emphasize the need for sub-specialty editing when assigning preferred terms to concepts 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. 
700 1 |a Elkin, P L  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Fenton, S H  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Atkin, G E  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Proceedings. AMIA Symposium  |d 1998  |g (1998) vom: 13., Seite 795-9  |w (DE-627)NLM098642928  |x 1531-605X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g year:1998  |g day:13  |g pages:795-9 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |j 1998  |b 13  |h 795-9