Comparison of multiple prediction models for ambulation following spinal cord injury
Few studies have properly compared predictive performance of different models using the same medical data set. We developed and compared 3 models (logistic regression, neural networks, and rough sets) in the in prediction of ambulation at hospital discharge following spinal cord injury. We used the...
| Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings. AMIA Symposium. - 1998. - (1998) vom: 13., Seite 528-32 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Weitere Verfasser: | , |
| Format: | Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
1998
|
| Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk: | Proceedings. AMIA Symposium |
| Schlagworte: | Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. |
| Zusammenfassung: | Few studies have properly compared predictive performance of different models using the same medical data set. We developed and compared 3 models (logistic regression, neural networks, and rough sets) in the in prediction of ambulation at hospital discharge following spinal cord injury. We used the multi-center Spinal Cord Injury Model System database. All models performed well and had areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the 0.88-0.91 range. All models had sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy greater than 80% at ideal thresholds. The performance of neural network and logistic regression methods was not statistically different (p = 0.48). The rough sets classifier performed statistically worse than either the neural network or logistic regression models (p-values 0.002 and 0.015 respectively) |
|---|---|
| Beschreibung: | Date Completed 16.03.1999 Date Revised 10.12.2019 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
| ISSN: | 1531-605X |