Preferences of interns and residents for E-mail, paging, or traditional methods for the delivery of different types of clinical information

We elicited from medical house staff their preferences for e-mail and alphanumeric pager as communication channels for the delivery of 18 different types of clinical information about their inpatients. For each type, we calculated the proportion of users who preferred delivery by e-mail, pager, both...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Proceedings. AMIA Symposium. - 1998. - (1998) vom: 13., Seite 140-4
1. Verfasser: Wagner, M M (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Eisenstadt, S A, Hogan, W R, Pankaskie, M C
Format: Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 1998
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Proceedings. AMIA Symposium
Schlagworte:Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 NLM098643177
003 DE-627
005 20231222112456.0
007 tu
008 231222s1998 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
028 5 2 |a pubmed24n0329.xml 
035 |a (DE-627)NLM098643177 
035 |a (NLM)9929198 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Wagner, M M  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Preferences of interns and residents for E-mail, paging, or traditional methods for the delivery of different types of clinical information 
264 1 |c 1998 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Date Completed 16.03.1999 
500 |a Date Revised 13.11.2018 
500 |a published: Print 
500 |a Citation Status MEDLINE 
520 |a We elicited from medical house staff their preferences for e-mail and alphanumeric pager as communication channels for the delivery of 18 different types of clinical information about their inpatients. For each type, we calculated the proportion of users who preferred delivery by e-mail, pager, both, or neither (usual delivery). For 14/18 (78%) types, more users preferred delivery by pager than by the other options. For 2/18 (11%) types, e-mail was preferred. For 2/18 (11%) types, more users preferred redundant delivery using both channels. For no types did more users prefer neither, meaning that the information would be delivered by traditional channels, if any. We conclude that medical house staff in the inpatient setting prefer to receive many types of clinical information by pager. The reason may be that they otherwise would have to query clinical information systems for these data, which is wasteful of their time and introduces delays into the process of care. Additionally, we found significant inter-user variability, suggesting that it may be useful for the notification services of an enterprise to employ user profiles for the delivery of clinical information 
650 4 |a Journal Article 
650 4 |a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. 
700 1 |a Eisenstadt, S A  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Hogan, W R  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Pankaskie, M C  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Proceedings. AMIA Symposium  |d 1998  |g (1998) vom: 13., Seite 140-4  |w (DE-627)NLM098642928  |x 1531-605X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g year:1998  |g day:13  |g pages:140-4 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_NLM 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |j 1998  |b 13  |h 140-4