The effects of LH-RH agonist alone or with flutamide in the treatment of stage D2 prostate cancer

We compared the clinical efficacy of treatment with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist alone to combined androgen blockade (CAB) with a LH-RH agonist and fiutamide. A total of 66 stage D2 prostate cancer patients were enrolled from Nov. 1992 to Mar. 1996 (n = 30: LH-RH agonist a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica. - 1962. - 44(1998), 7 vom: 05. Juli, Seite 477-80
1. Verfasser: Ito, T (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Aizawa, T, Yamamoto, S, Ohkubo, Y, Tsujino, S, Miki, M
Format: Aufsatz
Sprache:Japanese
Veröffentlicht: 1998
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica
Schlagworte:English Abstract Journal Article Androgen Antagonists Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone 33515-09-2 Flutamide 76W6J0943E
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We compared the clinical efficacy of treatment with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonist alone to combined androgen blockade (CAB) with a LH-RH agonist and fiutamide. A total of 66 stage D2 prostate cancer patients were enrolled from Nov. 1992 to Mar. 1996 (n = 30: LH-RH agonist alone, n = 36 CAB). Serum PSA levels after 3 months of treatment and progression-free survival rates (Kaplan-Meier curves) were compared. Results were statistically evaluated by Wilcoxon's text. There were no differences in PSA levels between LH-RH agonist alone and CAB. Progression-free survival rates were longer in the patients treated CAB compared to LH-RH agonist alone (P = 0.041). Furthermore, in patients with poorly differentiated prostate cancers, longer survival rates were also observed with CAB (P = 0.030). However, there were no differences in high EOD (> or = 2) patients between the two treatments (P = 0.652)
Beschreibung:Date Completed 22.10.1998
Date Revised 21.11.2013
published: Print
Citation Status MEDLINE
ISSN:0018-1994