Application of five continuous distributions and evaluation of wind potential at five stations using normal distribution

Application of Weibull distribution in a generalized way to estimate wind potential cannot always be advisable. The novelty of this work is to estimate wind potential using Normal probability density function. A comparison of five probability distributions namely Normal, Gamma, Chi-Squared, Weibull,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy Exploration & Exploitation. - Sage Publications, Inc.. - 39(2021), 6, Seite 2214-2239
1. Verfasser: Sumair, Muhammad (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Aized, Tauseef, Gardezi, Syed Asad Raza, Bhutta, Muhammad Mahmood Aslam, Rehman, Syed Muhammad Sohail, ur Rehman, Syed Ubaid
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2021
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Energy Exploration & Exploitation
LEADER 01000naa a22002652 4500
001 JST141337524
003 DE-627
005 20250107175149.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250107s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)JST141337524 
035 |a (JST)27166828 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Sumair, Muhammad  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Application of five continuous distributions and evaluation of wind potential at five stations using normal distribution 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Application of Weibull distribution in a generalized way to estimate wind potential cannot always be advisable. The novelty of this work is to estimate wind potential using Normal probability density function. A comparison of five probability distributions namely Normal, Gamma, Chi-Squared, Weibull, and Rayleigh was done using three performance evaluation criteria. Four years (2015–2018) hourly wind data at 50 m height at five stations near the coastline of Pakistan was used. It was found that normal distribution gives the best fit at each of these stations and against each evaluation criterion followed byWeibull distribution while Rayleigh distribution gives the poorest fit. Further energy generation by fifteen turbine models was calculated and GE 45.7 was found the best in terms of amount of energy generation and capacity factors while Vestas V42 shows the worst. However, GE/1.5 SL is the most economical while Vestas V63 is the least. Among five locations, Shahbandar is the best potential site while Manora is the least. 
540 |a © The Author(s) 2020 
655 4 |a research-article 
700 1 |a Aized, Tauseef  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Gardezi, Syed Asad Raza  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Bhutta, Muhammad Mahmood Aslam  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Rehman, Syed Muhammad Sohail  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a ur Rehman, Syed Ubaid  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Energy Exploration & Exploitation  |d Sage Publications, Inc.  |g 39(2021), 6, Seite 2214-2239  |w (DE-627)JST112767508  |x 20484054  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:39  |g year:2021  |g number:6  |g pages:2214-2239 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/27166828  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_350 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 39  |j 2021  |e 6  |h 2214-2239