|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000caa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
JST140177760 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20240613015411.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
240126s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)JST140177760
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (JST)44606005
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Lawlor, Rob
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Cake or death? Ending confusions about asymmetries between consent and refusal
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2016
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a In this paper, I will argue that much of the debate concerning asymmetries between consent and refusal (eg, in a case in which an adolescent is granted a right to consent to treatment, but not a right to refuse treatment) is confused. My aim in this paper is to highlight nuances and ambiguities, and to emphasise the fact that we are not just addressing a puzzle about one asymmetry between consent and refusal. I will show that there are a number of relevant asymmetries, not just the asymmetry of competence. And even if we focus specifically on the asymmetry of competence, we need to recognise that 'asymmetry of competence' is ambiguous. By clarifying these issues, my aim is to end the confusion that is common in this debate, allowing us to make progress on an issue that has previously been considered puzzling.
|
| 540 |
|
|
|a © 2016 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Law
|x Jurisprudence
|x Legal consent
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Environmental studies
|x Environmental philosophy
|x Environmental ethics
|x Bioethics
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Philosophy
|x Epistemology
|x Ambiguity
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Health sciences
|x Patient care
|x Medical case management
|x Treatment refusal
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Social sciences
|x Population studies
|x Human populations
|x Persons
|x Children
|x Adolescents
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Political science
|x Political philosophy
|x Political ideologies
|x Paternalism
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Social sciences
|x Communications
|x Communicative content
|x Nonsense
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Philosophy
|x Applied philosophy
|x Social philosophy
|x Social criticism
|x Critical theory
|x Metanarratives
|x Normativity
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Mathematics
|x Pure mathematics
|x Linear algebra
|x Vector analysis
|x Vector operations
|x Scalars
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Environmental studies
|x Environmental philosophy
|x Environmental ethics
|x Bioethics
|x Medical ethics
|x Extended essay
|
| 655 |
|
4 |
|a research-article
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Journal of Medical Ethics. in
|d Society for the Study of Medical Ethics
|g 42(2016), 11, Seite 748-754
|w (DE-627)JST049950649
|x 14734257
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:42
|g year:2016
|g number:11
|g pages:748-754
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://www.jstor.org/stable/44606005
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_JST
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 42
|j 2016
|e 11
|h 748-754
|