|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000caa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
JST140174826 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20240613015343.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
240126s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)JST140174826
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (JST)44014389
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Gavaghan, Colin
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Can facilitated aid in dying be permitted by 'double effect'? Some reflections from a recent New Zealand case
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2016
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a While the Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE) remains controversial in ethical circles, it continues to be recognised in common law courts. In 2015, the High Court of New Zealand became the latest to acknowledge the existence of the DDE, in a case that challenged the prohibition on physician assisted dying. In so doing, the possibility was raised that the DDE could potentially be used in an untraditional way to provide a prima facie justification of "facilitated aid in dying" (FAID) in some cases. In this article, we develop and offer justification for this line of reasoning. If it can be shown that FAID sometimes satisfies the conditions for DDE, this, we suggest, may have significant implications for the aid in dying debate, not only in New Zealand, but more widely. Even if all of the elements of the DDE are not met in such cases, though, we suggest that one of those elements — the doctor's intent in providing FAID — may not always be such as to attract moral blame or criminal culpability.
|
| 540 |
|
|
|a © 2016 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Behavioral sciences
|x Human behavior
|x Violence
|x Killing
|x Euthanasia
|x Voluntary euthanasia
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Biological sciences
|x Biology
|x Developmental biology
|x Life cycle
|x Death
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Philosophy
|x Axiology
|x Ethics
|x Normative ethics
|x Consequentialism
|x Double effect
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Philosophy
|x Axiology
|x Ethics
|x Normative ethics
|x Morality
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Environmental studies
|x Environmental philosophy
|x Environmental ethics
|x Bioethics
|x Medical ethics
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Health sciences
|x Medical sciences
|x Pharmaceutics
|x Pharmaceutical preparations
|x Dosage forms
|x Pills
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Health sciences
|x Health and wellness
|x Health outcomes
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Health sciences
|x Medical treatment
|x Anesthesia
|x Analgesia
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Behavioral sciences
|x Human behavior
|x Violence
|x Killing
|x Suicide
|x Attempted suicide
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Health sciences
|x Medical conditions
|x Symptoms
|x Pain
|x Editor's choice
|
| 655 |
|
4 |
|a research-article
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a King, Mike
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Journal of Medical Ethics. in
|d Society for the Study of Medical Ethics
|g 42(2016), 6, Seite 361-366
|w (DE-627)JST049950649
|x 14734257
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:42
|g year:2016
|g number:6
|g pages:361-366
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://www.jstor.org/stable/44014389
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_JST
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 42
|j 2016
|e 6
|h 361-366
|