|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01000caa a22002652 4500 |
| 001 |
JST140174516 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20240613015341.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
240126s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)JST140174516
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (JST)44014358
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Rulli, Tina
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Rescuing the duty to rescue
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 2016
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Clinicians and health researchers frequently encounter opportunities to rescue people. Rescue cases can generate a moral duty to aid those in peril. As such, bioethicists have leveraged a duty to rescue for a variety of purposes. Yet, despite its broad application, the duty to rescue is underanalysed. In this paper, we assess the state of theorising about the duty to rescue. There are large gaps in bioethicists' understanding of the force, scope and justification of the two most cited duties to rescue—the individual duty of easy rescue and the institutional rule of rescue. We argue that the duty of easy rescue faces unresolved challenges regarding its force and scope, and the rule of rescue is indefensible. If the duty to rescue is to help solve ethical problems, these theoretical gaps must be addressed. We identify two further conceptions of the duty to rescue that have received less attention—an institutional duty of easy rescue and the professional duty to rescue. Both provide guidance in addressing force and scope concerns and, thereby, traction in answering the outstanding problems with the duty to rescue. We conclude by proposing research priorities for developing accounts of duties to rescue in bioethics.
|
| 540 |
|
|
|a © 2016 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Environmental studies
|x Environmental philosophy
|x Environmental ethics
|x Bioethics
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Philosophy
|x Axiology
|x Ethics
|x Normative ethics
|x Morality
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Law
|x Civil law
|x Tort law
|x Duty to warn
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Health sciences
|x Medical sciences
|x Medical research
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Environmental studies
|x Environmental philosophy
|x Environmental ethics
|x Bioethics
|x Medical ethics
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Economics
|x Microeconomics
|x Economic costs and benefits
|x Economic costs
|x Opportunity costs
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Philosophy
|x Axiology
|x Ethics
|x Descriptive ethics
|x Moral agency
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Health sciences
|x Health care industry
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Mathematics
|x Applied mathematics
|x Statistics
|x Applied statistics
|x Statistical results
|x Statistical properties
|x Identifiability
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Philosophy
|x Applied philosophy
|x Applied ethics
|x Professional ethics
|x Fiduciary responsibility
|x Theoretical ethics
|
| 655 |
|
4 |
|a research-article
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Millum, Joseph
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
| 773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Journal of Medical Ethics. in
|d Society for the Study of Medical Ethics
|g 42(2016), 4, Seite 260-264
|w (DE-627)JST049950649
|x 14734257
|7 nnns
|
| 773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:42
|g year:2016
|g number:4
|g pages:260-264
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://www.jstor.org/stable/44014358
|3 Volltext
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
| 912 |
|
|
|a GBV_JST
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
| 952 |
|
|
|d 42
|j 2016
|e 4
|h 260-264
|