|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01000caa a22002652 4500 |
001 |
JST139968466 |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20240613012959.0 |
007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
008 |
240124s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)JST139968466
|
035 |
|
|
|a (JST)24582933
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Noxolo, Patricia
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Co-producing Caribbean geographies of in/security
|
264 |
|
1 |
|c 2014
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
520 |
|
|
|a This commentary is a friendly response to Chris Philo's Boundary Crossing article on the relevance of security as a theme for that year's RGS Annual Conference (Philo C 2012 Security of geography/geography of security Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37 1–7). The article did the important preliminary work of unfixing the meanings of security, and in particular introduced a fertile heuristic distinction between big-S and small-s security. This article seeks to bring this useful distinction into relationship with this year's (2014) RGS conference theme, the co-production of knowledge, through a located focus on the co-production of Caribbean big-S and small-s securities. It argues ultimately that co-production is a concept that needs to be used critically, and that engagement with Caribbean and other postcolonial theorists would be an excellent starting point.
|
540 |
|
|
|a Copyright © 2014 Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Behavioral sciences
|x Sociology
|x Social organization
|x Slavery
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Political science
|x Government
|x Political systems
|x Hegemony
|x Colonialism
|x Postcolonialism
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Political science
|x Politics
|x International politics
|x International relations
|x International security
|x Security studies
|x Environmental security
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Applied sciences
|x Engineering
|x Aerospace engineering
|x Aerospace safety
|x Aviation safety
|x Airport security
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Business
|x Industry
|x Industrial safety
|x Industrial security
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Physical sciences
|x Earth sciences
|x Geography
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Political science
|x Government
|x Political systems
|x Hegemony
|x Colonialism
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Physical sciences
|x Earth sciences
|x Geography
|x Geographic regions
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Political science
|x Politics
|x International politics
|x International relations
|x International security
|x Security studies
|x Political security
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Social sciences
|x Development studies
|x International development
|x Commentary
|
655 |
|
4 |
|a research-article
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Featherstone, David
|e verfasserin
|4 aut
|
773 |
0 |
8 |
|i Enthalten in
|t Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. in
|d Royal Geographical Society (With the Institute of British Geographers), 1935
|g 39(2014), 4, Seite 603-607
|w (DE-627)JST086822896
|x 14755661
|7 nnns
|
773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:39
|g year:2014
|g number:4
|g pages:603-607
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24582933
|3 Volltext
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
|
912 |
|
|
|a GBV_JST
|
951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
952 |
|
|
|d 39
|j 2014
|e 4
|h 603-607
|