WITH OR WITHOUT YOU: WHEN DOES MANAGERIAL EXIT MATTER FOR THE DISSOLUTION OF DYADIC MARKET TIES?

This paper investigates the relationship between managerial exit from advertising agencies and advertisers and the dissolution of dyadic market ties. We examine how the amount and locus (advertiser vs. agency) of managerial exit and the hierarchical level from which exit occurs (executives vs. excha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Academy of Management Journal. in. - Academy of Management, 1963. - 57(2014), 3, Seite 743-765
1. Verfasser: BROSCHAK, JOSEPH P. (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: BLOCK, EMILY S.
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2014
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:The Academy of Management Journal. in
Schlagworte:Mathematics Behavioral sciences Political science Social sciences Business Economics
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST139913386
003 DE-627
005 20240613012334.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240122s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)JST139913386 
035 |a (JST)43589281 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a BROSCHAK, JOSEPH P.  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a WITH OR WITHOUT YOU: WHEN DOES MANAGERIAL EXIT MATTER FOR THE DISSOLUTION OF DYADIC MARKET TIES? 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper investigates the relationship between managerial exit from advertising agencies and advertisers and the dissolution of dyadic market ties. We examine how the amount and locus (advertiser vs. agency) of managerial exit and the hierarchical level from which exit occurs (executives vs. exchange managers) influence the likelihood that dyadic market ties will dissolve. We theorize that managerial exit disrupts dyadic market ties through its effect on three mechanisms of social capital: investments in relationship-specific assets; formal control over market ties; and the intensity of interaction with exchange partners. We consider how market tie fragility, the financial performance of advertisers, and the duration of market ties condition the effects of managerial exit on market tie dissolution. In short, we theorize about which managerial roles matter more to market tie dissolution, why they matter and when they matter. Using longitudinal data on 232 dyadic ties between advertisers and New York City advertising agencies, we find that the number of executives and exchange managers who exit on both sides of market ties affects tie dissolution. However, these effects are neither symmetrical between exchange partners nor uniform across the hierarchical levels from which exit occurs, and vary with the strength of market ties. 
540 |a © Academy of Management Journal 
650 4 |a Mathematics  |x Pure mathematics  |x Algebra  |x Polynomials  |x Dyadics 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Sociology  |x Human societies  |x Social capital 
650 4 |a Political science  |x Government  |x Government agencies  |x Administrative agencies 
650 4 |a Social sciences  |x Communications  |x Advertising  |x Advertising campaigns  |x Consumer advertising 
650 4 |a Business  |x Industry  |x Industrial sectors  |x Knowledge industries  |x Communications industries  |x Advertising industry  |x Advertising agencies 
650 4 |a Economics  |x Economic disciplines  |x Financial economics  |x Finance  |x Financial management 
650 4 |a Business  |x Business entities 
650 4 |a Behavioral sciences  |x Human behavior  |x Social behavior  |x Social interaction  |x Conflict  |x Conflict management 
650 4 |a Business  |x Industry  |x Industrial sectors  |x Service industries  |x Professional services 
650 4 |a Business  |x Business administration  |x Corporate communications  |x External corporate communications  |x Marketing  |x Marketing management 
655 4 |a research-article 
700 1 |a BLOCK, EMILY S.  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The Academy of Management Journal. in  |d Academy of Management, 1963  |g 57(2014), 3, Seite 743-765  |w (DE-627)JST000284262  |x 19480989  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:57  |g year:2014  |g number:3  |g pages:743-765 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/43589281  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 57  |j 2014  |e 3  |h 743-765