Justification, conversation, and folk psychology

The aim of this paper is to offer a version of the so-called conversational hypothesis of the ontogenetic connection between language and mindreading (Harris 1996, 2005; Van Cleave and Gauker 2010; Hughes et al. 2006). After arguing against a particular way of understanding the hypothesis (the commu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science. - University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU). - 34(2019), 1, Seite 73-88
1. Verfasser:	Castro, Víctor Fernández (VerfasserIn)
Format:	Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:	English
Veröffentlicht:	2019
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:	Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science
Schlagworte:	Philosophy Behavioral sciences Social sciences Linguistics


LEADER	01000caa a22002652 4500
001	JST139534024
003	DE-627
005	20240626010609.0
007	cr uuu---uuuuu
008	240119s2019 xx \|\|\|\|\|o 00\| \|\|eng c
035			\|a (DE-627)JST139534024
035			\|a (JST)26614239
040			\|a DE-627 \|b ger \|c DE-627 \|e rakwb
041			\|a eng
100	1		\|a Castro, Víctor Fernández \|e verfasserin \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a Justification, conversation, and folk psychology
264		1	\|c 2019
336			\|a Text \|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|a Computermedien \|b c \|2 rdamedia
338			\|a Online-Ressource \|b cr \|2 rdacarrier
520			\|a The aim of this paper is to offer a version of the so-called conversational hypothesis of the ontogenetic connection between language and mindreading (Harris 1996, 2005; Van Cleave and Gauker 2010; Hughes et al. 2006). After arguing against a particular way of understanding the hypothesis (the communicative view), I will start from the justificatory view in philosophy of social cognition (Andrews 2012; Hutto 2004; Zawidzki 2013) to make the case for the idea that the primary function of belief and desire attributions is to justify and normalize deviant patterns of behaviour. Following this framework, I elaborate upon the idea that development of folk psychological skills requires the subjects to engage in conversationally mediated joint and cooperative activities in order to acquire the conceptual capacity of ascribing propositional attitudes. After presenting the general version of the hypothesis, I present several testable sub-hypotheses and some psychological studies that give empirical plausibility to the hypothesis. El objetivo de este artículo es ofrecer una versión de la hipótesis conversacional sobre conexión ontogenética entre lenguaje y lectura de mentes (Harris 1996, 2005; Van Cleave and Gauker 2010; Hughes et al. 2006). Después de argumentar contra una versión particular de dicha hipótesis (Versión Comunicativa), partiré de la visión justificativa de la cognición social (Andrews 2012; Hutto 2004; Zawidzki 2013) para defender que la función primaria de la adscripción de creencias y deseos es la de justificar y normalizar patrones de comportamiento anormales. Tomando en consideración este marco teórico, argumentaré que el desarrollo de las habilidades de lectura de mentes requiere que los sujetos participen en actividades cooperativas y conjuntas mediadas conversacionalmente gracias a las cuales pueden adquirir la capacidad conceptual de adscribir actitudes proposicionales. Después de presentar la versión general de la hipótesis, se presentan diferentes sub-hipótesis susceptibles de ser testadas y estudios empíricos que las refuerzan.
540			\|a © 2019 UPV/EHU
650		4	\|a Philosophy \|x Applied philosophy \|x Social philosophy \|x Social theories \|x Ascriptions
650		4	\|a Behavioral sciences \|x Psychology \|x Cognitive psychology \|x Emotion \|x Emotional states \|x Desire
650		4	\|a Philosophy \|x Metaphysics \|x Philosophy of mind \|x Concept of mind \|x Consciousness theory \|x Monopsychism \|x Mind
650		4	\|a Behavioral sciences \|x Anthropology \|x Applied anthropology \|x Cultural anthropology \|x Cultural studies \|x Cultural psychology \|x Folk psychology
650		4	\|a Behavioral sciences \|x Leisure studies \|x Recreation \|x Games \|x Childrens games \|x Pretend play
650		4	\|a Behavioral sciences \|x Psychology \|x Cognitive psychology \|x Social cognition
650		4	\|a Behavioral sciences \|x Psychology \|x Developmental psychology \|x Child psychology \|x Child development
650		4	\|a Social sciences \|x Communications \|x Rhetoric \|x Discourse \|x Argumentation
650		4	\|a Linguistics \|x Grammar \|x Parts of speech \|x Verbs
650		4	\|a Behavioral sciences \|x Psychology \|x Developmental psychology \|x ARTICLES
655		4	\|a research-article
773	0	8	\|i Enthalten in \|t Theoria: An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science \|d University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) \|g 34(2019), 1, Seite 73-88 \|w (DE-627)606032096 \|w (DE-600)2508179-2 \|x 2171679X \|7 nnns
773	1	8	\|g volume:34 \|g year:2019 \|g number:1 \|g pages:73-88
856	4	0	\|u https://www.jstor.org/stable/26614239 \|3 Volltext
912			\|a GBV_USEFLAG_A
912			\|a SYSFLAG_A
912			\|a GBV_JST
912			\|a GBV_ILN_11
912			\|a GBV_ILN_20
912			\|a GBV_ILN_22
912			\|a GBV_ILN_23
912			\|a GBV_ILN_24
912			\|a GBV_ILN_31
912			\|a GBV_ILN_39
912			\|a GBV_ILN_40
912			\|a GBV_ILN_60
912			\|a GBV_ILN_62
912			\|a GBV_ILN_63
912			\|a GBV_ILN_65
912			\|a GBV_ILN_69
912			\|a GBV_ILN_70
912			\|a GBV_ILN_73
912			\|a GBV_ILN_95
912			\|a GBV_ILN_100
912			\|a GBV_ILN_105
912			\|a GBV_ILN_110
912			\|a GBV_ILN_151
912			\|a GBV_ILN_161
912			\|a GBV_ILN_170
912			\|a GBV_ILN_171
912			\|a GBV_ILN_206
912			\|a GBV_ILN_213
912			\|a GBV_ILN_230
912			\|a GBV_ILN_285
912			\|a GBV_ILN_293
912			\|a GBV_ILN_370
912			\|a GBV_ILN_374
912			\|a GBV_ILN_602
912			\|a GBV_ILN_702
912			\|a GBV_ILN_1200
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2001
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2003
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2005
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2006
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2007
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2008
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2009
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2010
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2011
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2014
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2015
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2018
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2020
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2021
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2026
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2027
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2044
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2050
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2055
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2056
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2057
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2061
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2107
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2111
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2190
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2949
912			\|a GBV_ILN_2950
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4012
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4035
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4037
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4046
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4112
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4125
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4126
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4242
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4249
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4251
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4305
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4306
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4307
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4313
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4322
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4323
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4324
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4325
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4335
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4338
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4346
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4367
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4392
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4393
912			\|a GBV_ILN_4700
951			\|a AR
952			\|d 34 \|j 2019 \|e 1 \|h 73-88