Adaptive plasticity to heterogeneous environments increases capacity for division of labor in the clonal invader Carpobrotus edulis (Aizoaceae)

• Premise of the study: Clonality has been proposed as an important mechanism favoring plant invasions, but few studies have been conducted to determine the role of clonal traits on successful invaders. An interesting trait associated with clonality is the capacity for division of labor. Division of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American Journal of Botany. - Botanical Society of America, Inc.. - 101(2014), 8, Seite 1301-1308
1. Verfasser: Roiloa, Sergio R. (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Rodriguez-Echeverria, Susana, Lopez-Otero, Aaron, Retuerto, Ruben, Freitas, Helena
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2014
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:American Journal of Botany
Schlagworte:Biological sciences Business Physical sciences
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST139219366
003 DE-627
005 20240626003427.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240117s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)JST139219366 
035 |a (JST)43826684 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Roiloa, Sergio R.  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Adaptive plasticity to heterogeneous environments increases capacity for division of labor in the clonal invader Carpobrotus edulis (Aizoaceae) 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a • Premise of the study: Clonality has been proposed as an important mechanism favoring plant invasions, but few studies have been conducted to determine the role of clonal traits on successful invaders. An interesting trait associated with clonality is the capacity for division of labor. Division of labor requires a negative spatial correlation between the availabilities of two essential resources and ramet specialization for locally abundant resources to increase the overall performance of the clone. We hypothesized that the capacity for division of labor in the clonal invader Carpobrotus edulis will be selected in those clones from patchy environments where this trait could be an advantage. • Methods: Morphological and physiological division of labor was compared between clones from coastal sand dunes (where nutrients and light show a negative spatial covariance) and from rocky coasts (where nutrients and light are homogenously distributed). • Key results: Clones from coastal sand dunes showed a greater capacity than clones from rocky coasts for division of labor. Specialization for abundance was found at the morphological (biomass allocated to roots) and the physiological (photochemical efficiency) level. • Conclusions: The greater ability for division of labor in the patchy environment where the presence of this trait would be more beneficial demonstrates the existence of local adaptation and suggests that rapid evolution in clonal traits could be contributing to the success of the invader C. edulis. This study is one of the few showing that division of labor is under selection and is the first reporting adaptive division of labor of an aggressive invader. 
540 |a Copyright 2014 Botanical Society of America, Inc. 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Ecology  |x Population ecology  |x Synecology  |x Habitats 
650 4 |a Business  |x Business economics  |x Commercial production  |x Productivity  |x Division of labor 
650 4 |a Physical sciences  |x Earth sciences  |x Geography  |x Geomorphology  |x Landforms  |x Aeolian landforms  |x Sand dunes 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Ecology  |x Ecological processes  |x Ecological competition  |x Interspecific competition  |x Ecological invasion 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Biology  |x Biological taxonomies  |x Species  |x Introduced species  |x Invasive species 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Biology  |x Botany  |x Plant ecology 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Ecology  |x Aquatic ecology  |x Marine ecology  |x Coastal ecology 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Biology  |x Genetics  |x Population genetics  |x Ecological genetics 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Biology  |x Genetics  |x Genotypes 
650 4 |a Biological sciences  |x Biochemistry  |x Biomolecules  |x Biological pigments  |x Chlorophylls  |x Ecology 
655 4 |a research-article 
700 1 |a Rodriguez-Echeverria, Susana  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lopez-Otero, Aaron  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Retuerto, Ruben  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Freitas, Helena  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t American Journal of Botany  |d Botanical Society of America, Inc.  |g 101(2014), 8, Seite 1301-1308  |w (DE-627)332339998  |w (DE-600)2053581-8  |x 15372197  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:101  |g year:2014  |g number:8  |g pages:1301-1308 
856 4 0 |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/43826684  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_23 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_32 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_73 
912 |a GBV_ILN_74 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_95 
912 |a GBV_ILN_100 
912 |a GBV_ILN_105 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_120 
912 |a GBV_ILN_138 
912 |a GBV_ILN_150 
912 |a GBV_ILN_151 
912 |a GBV_ILN_161 
912 |a GBV_ILN_165 
912 |a GBV_ILN_170 
912 |a GBV_ILN_171 
912 |a GBV_ILN_187 
912 |a GBV_ILN_213 
912 |a GBV_ILN_224 
912 |a GBV_ILN_230 
912 |a GBV_ILN_266 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_293 
912 |a GBV_ILN_370 
912 |a GBV_ILN_374 
912 |a GBV_ILN_602 
912 |a GBV_ILN_636 
912 |a GBV_ILN_702 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2004 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2007 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2008 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2011 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2025 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2026 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2034 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2038 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2044 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2048 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2049 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2050 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2055 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2056 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2057 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2059 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2061 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2064 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2068 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2088 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2093 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2106 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2107 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2108 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2111 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2113 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2118 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2119 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2122 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2129 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2143 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2144 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2147 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2148 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2152 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2153 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2188 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2190 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2232 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2336 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2360 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2470 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2472 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2507 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2522 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2548 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2939 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2942 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2946 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2949 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2951 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4012 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4046 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4125 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4242 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4246 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4249 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4251 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4306 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4307 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4313 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4322 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4324 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4326 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4333 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4334 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4335 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4336 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4338 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4346 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4367 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4393 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4700 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 101  |j 2014  |e 8  |h 1301-1308