"Formed for Empire" : The Continental Congress Responds to the Carlisle Peace Commission

Hoping to win back the thirteen colonies, Parliament in 1778 relinquished its power over internal taxation and regulation and gave the Carlisle Peace Commission wide discretion to suspend British policies in order to negotiate a truce. Because the Continental Congress consistently rejected these pea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Early Republic. - University of Pennsylvania Press. - 38(2018), 4, Seite 643-672
1. Verfasser: GREGORY, ANTHONY (VerfasserIn)
Format: Online-Aufsatz
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: 2018
Zugriff auf das übergeordnete Werk:Journal of the Early Republic
Schlagworte:Carlisle Peace Commission American Revolution Diplomatic history Dissent Constitutionalism Sovereignty Confederation Empire Gouverneur Morris William Henry Drayton mehr... Richard Henry Lee Frederick Howard William Eden Loyalists
LEADER 01000caa a22002652 4500
001 JST138750947
003 DE-627
005 20240625234838.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240115s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)JST138750947 
035 |a (JST)90026356 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a GREGORY, ANTHONY  |e verfasserin  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a "Formed for Empire"  |b The Continental Congress Responds to the Carlisle Peace Commission 
264 1 |c 2018 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Hoping to win back the thirteen colonies, Parliament in 1778 relinquished its power over internal taxation and regulation and gave the Carlisle Peace Commission wide discretion to suspend British policies in order to negotiate a truce. Because the Continental Congress consistently rejected these peace offerings and achieved independence, few historians have given serious attention to the interaction between Congress and the Commissioners. This article argues that the process of rejecting the Commission’s gestures marked an important watershed in the conceptualization of congressional power and national unity. Congress donned a public face of confidence and unanimity even as its leadership worried about dissent and disloyalty. This tension mirrored the paradoxes of American sovereignty, touted in terms of high principle and consent, but secured through force and diplomatic opportunism. The timing of the offers, after Saratoga and during negotiations for a French alliance, only highlighted the peculiarities of American sovereignty, which claimed command over as well as deference to the states. As the months passed, Congress and the Commissioners engaged in an argument over their authority to rule, exposing contradictions in their governing logic, and resorted increasingly to desperate appeals to the individual states and to shows of force to maintain mastery over the continent. Occurring at a unique moment in the reconciliation of the paradoxes of imperial sovereignty, Congress’s response to the Commission deserves a special place in the history of the U.S. nation-state’s formation. 
540 |a Copyright © 2018 Society for Historians of the Early American Republic 
650 4 |a Carlisle Peace Commission 
650 4 |a American Revolution 
650 4 |a Diplomatic history 
650 4 |a Dissent 
650 4 |a Constitutionalism 
650 4 |a Sovereignty 
650 4 |a Confederation 
650 4 |a Empire 
650 4 |a Gouverneur Morris 
650 4 |a William Henry Drayton 
650 4 |a Richard Henry Lee 
650 4 |a Frederick Howard 
650 4 |a William Eden 
650 4 |a Loyalists 
655 4 |a research-article 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of the Early Republic  |d University of Pennsylvania Press  |g 38(2018), 4, Seite 643-672  |w (DE-627)341354406  |w (DE-600)2068171-9  |x 15530620  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:38  |g year:2018  |g number:4  |g pages:643-672 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/90026356  |3 Volltext 
912 |a GBV_USEFLAG_A 
912 |a SYSFLAG_A 
912 |a GBV_JST 
912 |a GBV_ILN_11 
912 |a GBV_ILN_20 
912 |a GBV_ILN_22 
912 |a GBV_ILN_24 
912 |a GBV_ILN_31 
912 |a GBV_ILN_39 
912 |a GBV_ILN_40 
912 |a GBV_ILN_60 
912 |a GBV_ILN_62 
912 |a GBV_ILN_63 
912 |a GBV_ILN_65 
912 |a GBV_ILN_69 
912 |a GBV_ILN_70 
912 |a GBV_ILN_90 
912 |a GBV_ILN_100 
912 |a GBV_ILN_110 
912 |a GBV_ILN_120 
912 |a GBV_ILN_206 
912 |a GBV_ILN_285 
912 |a GBV_ILN_374 
912 |a GBV_ILN_702 
912 |a GBV_ILN_1200 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2001 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2003 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2005 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2006 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2007 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2008 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2009 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2010 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2011 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2014 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2015 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2018 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2020 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2021 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2025 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2026 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2027 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2031 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2038 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2044 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2048 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2050 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2055 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2056 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2057 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2061 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2107 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2111 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2113 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2190 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2875 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2938 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2949 
912 |a GBV_ILN_2950 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4035 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4037 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4046 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4112 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4126 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4242 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4251 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4305 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4306 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4307 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4313 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4322 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4323 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4325 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4326 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4335 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4338 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4346 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4393 
912 |a GBV_ILN_4700 
951 |a AR 
952 |d 38  |j 2018  |e 4  |h 643-672